Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:30 am  

Somewhere amongst all this carry on with Ryan there is a 23 year old young man having to deal with a vindictiveness that should have been dealt with by the governing body if no one else is capable of sorting it out. Rugby League cares is trying to sort out the problems that are faced by many sportsmen and women and this sort of acrimony is not helpful or condusive to the mental health of our sports people.

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:48 am  

Rarebreed wrote:

Somewhere amongst all this carry on with Ryan there is a 23 year old young man having to deal with a vindictiveness that should have been dealt with by the governing body if no one else is capable of sorting it out. Rugby League cares is trying to sort out the problems that are faced by many sportsmen and women and this sort of acrimony is not helpful or condusive to the mental health of our sports people.

the thing is its Brierley that keeps going to the press and leaves the club no option to replied,for the last 2 years Brierley is never far away from the media and he loves the spotlight but now he's not the big fish at the club he's not happy and he's spat his dummy.If he wants to go let him but if he loves Leigh like he keeps saying why didn't he let them get a transfer fee for him

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:56 am  

roger daly wrote:

I see Ryan Brierleys dad has responded to Jukes comments on Twitter

I believe his dad. Fat Derek pulling the strings again, all end in tears

sorry but you don't live in Leigh and only get bits of the things that are actually said,Brierley contradicted himself on twitter to what he said in his statement and iv known a lot of the people at Leigh for years so I know who I believe

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:02 pm  

It doesn't matter who we believe, it needs sorting in private by someone in authority. It should never have got this far.

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:23 pm  

A

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:36 pm  

roger daly wrote: I see Ryan Brierleys dad has responded to Jukes comments on Twitter I believe his dad. Fat Derek pulling the strings again, all end in tears Jukes defends himself. http://www.totalrl.com/jukes-leigh-cent ... -brierley/ You believe Ryan's dad just because you hate Derek, no other reason.

roger daly wrote: I see Ryan Brierleys dad has responded to Jukes comments on Twitter I believe his dad. Fat Derek pulling the strings again, all end in tears Jukes defends himself. http://www.totalrl.com/jukes-leigh-cent ... -brierley/ You believe Ryan's dad just because you hate Derek, no other reason.

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:45 pm  

Cokey wrote: [/u][/b] Jukes defends himself. http://www.totalrl.com/jukes-leigh-cent ... -brierley/ You believe Ryan's dad just because you hate Derek, no other reason. Cokey, Jukes defends himself and Brierley defends himself and their stories are different. Why do you believe Jukes

Cokey wrote: [/u][/b] Jukes defends himself. http://www.totalrl.com/jukes-leigh-cent ... -brierley/ You believe Ryan's dad just because you hate Derek, no other reason. Cokey, Jukes defends himself and Brierley defends himself and their stories are different. Why do you believe Jukes

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:51 pm  

roger daly wrote:

What's living in Leigh got to do with owt. I live in Bradford and I know the exact reason why Chase isn't playing. I live in Bradford and I know how some Leigh players get paid most of their wage. I don't understand what your point is

Do you actually know though? Have you witnessed or seen or have documents which back up what you know? If you do and you know then you will be able without fear of legal repercussions to put this information into the public domain. Or is it that what you know is a strong rumour from a reliable source. The only thing I know about this is that it is a silly mess (opinion) that for some reason is being played out in the media (fact).

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:53 pm  

If Brierley said he has had an approach by Bradford but will stay for an extra £15k he stands to gain £15k.

If Jukes makes up a lie about Brierley saying he was approached by Bradford but will stay for £15k he stands to gain... nowt. Quite the opposite it caused a massive drama and turmoil at the club days before a big game against Sheffield.

I 100% believe that Brierley has said what he is alleged to have said. Whether that offer was ever actually made or if it was merely a bargaining tool thinking he had us over a barrel with all our other half backs injured... that I am not so certain of.

Re: Illegal approach? : Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:57 pm  

roger daly wrote:

Cokey, Jukes defends himself and Brierley defends himself and their stories are different. Why do you believe Jukes

Well to say he will do what it takes to prove he his not lying,Is good enough for me.

BTW - Why do you believe Ryan's dad?

And can you clarify how you know the reason why chase isn't playing?