Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 5:02 pm  

We were sailing long and got drawn into the nasty stuff. You have to feel for our lot, so many head shots, lashes with arms in the tackle, knees and elbows that went unpunished. I'd said to my lad before the game that Clark v Barlow would be an interesting sideshow. They put us off our stride as they have done with other teams this year. Chisholm was class at times but the tackling near our try line concerns me. To concede 28 points to Swinton is unforgivable.

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 6:27 pm  

Well, the 13 vs 11 certainly made it a bit more interesting didn't it?

I've seen games against Swinton twice now this season, and I hope I never have to watch them again - grubby, niggly, and downright dirty. Our indiscipline almost cost us, but you can hardly blame people for taking a swing when there's endless provocation and the ref only seems to see what he wants to see.

Again though, some strange selections. Why exactly was Howarth playing instead of Lumb, and Ferguson in place of Bentley? For goodness sake, we've already guaranteed top spot in the Shield - it was a DEAD rubber!!! Why didn't we have 3 or 4 of the Academy graduates mixed into the 17 for today?

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 6:52 pm  

paulwalker71 wrote:

Well, the 13 vs 11 certainly made it a bit more interesting didn't it?

I've seen games against Swinton twice now this season, and I hope I never have to watch them again - grubby, niggly, and downright dirty. Our indiscipline almost cost us, but you can hardly blame people for taking a swing when there's endless provocation and the ref only seems to see what he wants to see.

Again though, some strange selections. Why exactly was Howarth playing instead of Lumb, and Ferguson in place of Bentley? For goodness sake, we've already guaranteed top spot in the Shield - it was a DEAD rubber!!! Why didn't we have 3 or 4 of the Academy graduates mixed into the 17 for today?

You probably answered that last question in your first description of Swinton - which I totally agree with.
Probably not a game to throw teenagers into.

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 7:49 pm  

Very disappointed that we got drawn into a scrappy game by the idiot Barlow and his pals. Unfortunately their tactics worked and we ended up with a player sent off. At least the game showed Rohan that Haworth must not be given a contract, he was very poor today. BTW a shocking refereeing display once again, I can't believe the things he missed and his interpretation of events today.

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 7:54 pm  

woolly07 wrote:

You probably answered that last question in your first description of Swinton - which I totally agree with.
Probably not a game to throw teenagers into.

I take the point, Woolly and I suspect Rohan would say something similar

But when is it a game to throw them in? We couldn't do it before because 'we had to secure top spot', or next week at Workington because 'it always tough in Cumbria' or the following week for some other reason etc etc

It would a shame to let these Shield games go by (let's face it, they don't matter much) without giving a fair few of our Academy graduates a first team run out

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Sun Sep 04, 2016 9:27 pm  

paulwalker71 wrote:

Well, the 13 vs 11 certainly made it a bit more interesting didn't it?

I've seen games against Swinton twice now this season, and I hope I never have to watch them again - grubby, niggly, and downright dirty. Our indiscipline almost cost us, but you can hardly blame people for taking a swing when there's endless provocation and the ref only seems to see what he wants to see.

Again though, some strange selections. Why exactly was Howarth playing instead of Lumb, and Ferguson in place of Bentley? For goodness sake, we've already guaranteed top spot in the Shield - it was a DEAD rubber!!! Why didn't we have 3 or 4 of the Academy graduates mixed into the 17 for today?

I wouldn't have risked our Acadamy players against this type of opposition. Since we lost the Open Age players it has become more difficult to put these young players on the field. A couple more years on their backs would help. Besides which we are still paying these players who are leaving us and they know how to deal with this type of play. Apparently Swinton needed one point to stay up and I feel this lends itself to a war of attrition.

[Bulliac]

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:58 am  

Rarebreed wrote:

I wouldn't have risked our Acadamy players against this type of opposition. Since we lost the Open Age players it has become more difficult to put these young players on the field. A couple more years on their backs would help. Besides which we are still paying these players who are leaving us and they know how to deal with this type of play. Apparently Swinton needed one point to stay up and I feel this lends itself to a war of attrition.

No, neither would I.

Anyone else slightly worried by the headline on 'Bulls' news' from the website? Apparently, Rohan was "pleased" with the twelve man Bulls - remembering that we used to have coach who was so happy with the way a forward was playing in the halves that he didn't want another halfback to play for us again, I'm so hoping this doesn't lead to us only 'needing' twelve man teams from now on.....

[Bullseye]

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:03 am  

Must say I was very impressed with our own Ethan Ryan yesterday. All three tries were something special. That second with the "in and away" was bloody great.

Chuffed that he's signed up.

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:30 am  

Bullseye wrote:

Must say I was very impressed with our own Ethan Ryan yesterday. All three tries were something special. That second with the "in and away" was bloody great.

Chuffed that he's signed up.

That was a very classy try by someone full of self confidence. Also bonus points on his third try for the little roll he did as he grounded the ball

[Bullseye]

Re: Swinton Lions 4/9/16 : Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:32 am  

Newlove-esque sidestep.