Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:53 am  

BiffasBoys wrote:

Perhaps JCT600 saw City as better value for money & providing more of a profile? 2 Wembley's & a huge amount of TV coverage across all channels?

You only have the word of those at the Bulls that the Provident deal is record breaking. Perhaps they were 'Bulling Up' what they had got?

Why would a sponsor offer a record breaking deal to a club that had not seen the play offs since 2008?

Provident were lined up to sponsor the Challenge Cup, but they instead chose to offer record money to the Bulls?

I hope those were rhetorical questions!

All I know is after about a decade of free-fall, City finally got themselves on stable ground financially*, found a manager that gave them a footballing foothold and have done well last season, pre-Parkinson City were flirting with the oblivion of non-league football for two seasons. This is their on-going progress of rebuilding from numerous administrations. We're at that stage now, there are problems and will probably be more, yet some seem gleeful to stick the boot in.

(* or so we're told, as stable as a football club at level can be I imagine)

Dare I say you seem knowledgable of those involved at Bradford, so at least have some interest in the club. As a fan or not of t'Bulls, what do you think is on store for us in the forseeable?

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:54 am  

BiffasBoys wrote:

Dangling from a rope somewhere? I'd imagine even he is finding it hard to put up with what's going on.

Thereby in one post confirming yourself as both a nasty piece of work, and as a reincarnation of the previous troll you used to be.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:56 am  

BiffasBoys wrote:

Well. Khan certainly bought a puppy

Careful, your agenda is showing. FYI he wasn't sold a pup, he was sold the mighty, famous and historic Bradford rugby league club. In comparison to which, trolling amoeba such as yourself are of zero significance.

BiffasBoys wrote:

It wasn't a new question.

Yes. It was.

BiffasBoys wrote:

Perhaps you need to take a closer look at the Khan/Sutcliffe/Whitcut relationship to understand better

Perhaps i don't, but being lazy, just enlighten me, in quick bullet points, what you think are the main things of relevance that i would learn, if I did somehow "take a closer look" at this "relationship".?

BiffasBoys wrote:

Of course they do. In the case of the Bulls to have two so large in the first year of operation points to a lack of capital investment by the owner.

What a stupid analysis. You seem to be an economic ignoramus. With respect etc.

BiffasBoys wrote:

Council tax payers money being used to prop up a business owned by the long time funder of the local MP?

OK Bulls Limited is a long time funder of Gerry Sutcliffe? That's a new one on me. No doubt you will be able to provide some evidence of this arrangement, though as OKBL has only existed a year I don't see how it could long time, and I can tell you before you bluff your answer, for a fact, that OKBL has never paid a penny to fund GSMP.

BiffasBoys wrote:

I'd suggest you ask the T&A reporters who deal with Khan, or read any of the statements attributed to him or Whitcut surrounding this investment in his own business. Why would he seek to publicise it?

Now you are shifting the goalposts. But at the same time, he can't win. If he reveals that he is putting more money in, he is damned. If he doesn't reveal he is putting more money, why, he's damned too for secrecy and not being open with the fans. To me, the announcement that OK was arranging to make another 900K available toi the club served a number of purposes, one being to provide public reassurance and confidence. But if you want to believe all he was doing was bigging himself up, go right ahead.

BiffasBoys wrote:

For example JCT600 dropped the Bulls & now back City.

Except that that's just plain wrong. So do you have an actual example? You know, one that is, er, "correct"? No? Didn't think so.

BiffasBoys wrote:

Equally other companies will be attracted to City first given their prominence & success.

There you go again, getting all carried away. City (who had a great season) scraped the last promotion spot in the playoffs, to finally escape from the 4th division to the 3rd. That's all. I applaud them and I am pleased fro them but we play in the premier division of our sport not somewhere down in the lower leagues. It is an achievement, but escaping teh bottom division after many years of failure is not the "success" you suggest. the only additional factor last year was City's prominence due to their Cup run. They seem to have decided to reduce their prominence this season as they are already out of 2 cups.

BiffasBoys wrote:

Crowds too are reflecting the relative fortunes of both clubs

Never! You don't say?! Well, I'm glad I was sitting down. An astonsihing insight. Has this ever happened before anywhere?

Of course, it is an irrelevance. It would only be relevant if the Bradford fans were like ball bearings on a tray, and would all roll from the City end to the Bulls end, or vice versa, depending which was higher. Actually, while tere is some overlap, it really doesn't work like that. If both teams were doing well then both teams would get good crowds. And in the past, have.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:30 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Thereby in one post confirming yourself as both a nasty piece of work, and as a reincarnation of the previous troll you used to be.

Eh? It was a light hearted comment on how even the most seemingly level headed & knowledgeable Bulls fan may well be feeling with the revelations continuing to emerge after the disaster of Hood et al.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:41 pm  

Biffa, I've quite enjoyed you but you're beginning to stretch it. For example,

"Vipin Joshi is also a director. Check out the Bradford regeneration organisation Khan, Greenwood & joshi are linked to. Got millions of Bradford Council money & is under investigation".

Which organisation?
In what way are the people you refer to linked to it?
How many 'millions' of Bradford Council money did they get?
Who is investigating?
What is being investigated?

Yours is an interesting thesis but I'm afraid it requires a tad more evidence than your offering. There can hardly be an adult in the country who doesn't have links to a club, charity, workplace where an investigation of some kind has taken place.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:44 pm  

hindle xiii wrote:

I hope those were rhetorical questions!

All I know is after about a decade of free-fall, City finally got themselves on stable ground financially*, found a manager that gave them a footballing foothold and have done well last season, pre-Parkinson City were flirting with the oblivion of non-league football for two seasons. This is their on-going progress of rebuilding from numerous administrations. We're at that stage now, there are problems and will probably be more, yet some seem gleeful to stick the boot in.

(* or so we're told, as stable as a football club at level can be I imagine)

Dare I say you seem knowledgable of those involved at Bradford, so at least have some interest in the club. As a fan or not of t'Bulls, what do you think is on store for us in the forseeable?

I genuinely have no interest in the Bulls, but do wish them to survive & prosper. They have some great fans who are going through thin times.

What does concern me is that the mob now in control are, in my opinion as bad as, if not worse than the last lot.
A closed, secretive little clique who have no intention of being open & honest with the supporters they expect to sustain their business.

The disdain they are showing towards fans will come back to bite them very badly. Sutcliffe is a politician. Politicians by nature are liars, deceitful & evasive, appealing only to their core demographic to keep their jobs.
This is not the road to go down for the Bulls, in my opinion.

The Bulls need to have city wide, fresh, untainted appeal. Instead they have a politically incestuous, less than open & honest bunch with a patriarchal egomaniac at the head of it all.

Sutcliffe's boasts about investment from Qatar have come to zero. Jay Willey didn't seem to be around long. Kate Hardcastle hasn't uttered a word for a long time. This talk of a 14 person board is laughable.

I see the Bulls being outside of the top 6-8 clubs for quite some time to come.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:50 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Careful, your agenda is showing. FYI he wasn't sold a pup, he was sold the mighty, famous and historic Bradford rugby league club. In comparison to which, trolling amoeba such as yourself are of zero significance.

Yes. It was.

Perhaps i don't, but being lazy, just enlighten me, in quick bullet points, what you think are the main things of relevance that i would learn, if I did somehow "take a closer look" at this "relationship".?

What a stupid analysis. You seem to be an economic ignoramus. With respect etc.

OK Bulls Limited is a long time funder of Gerry Sutcliffe? That's a new one on me. No doubt you will be able to provide some evidence of this arrangement, though as OKBL has only existed a year I don't see how it could long time, and I can tell you before you bluff your answer, for a fact, that OKBL has never paid a penny to fund GSMP.

This comment alone, never mind your ridiculous one about me being a previous poster, shows your inability to read & understand what I actually said. The rest of your post isn't even worth addressing

Now you are shifting the goalposts. But at the same time, he can't win. If he reveals that he is putting more money in, he is damned. If he doesn't reveal he is putting more money, why, he's damned too for secrecy and not being open with the fans. To me, the announcement that OK was arranging to make another 900K available toi the club served a number of purposes, one being to provide public reassurance and confidence. But if you want to believe all he was doing was bigging himself up, go right ahead.

Except that that's just plain wrong. So do you have an actual example? You know, one that is, er, "correct"? No? Didn't think so.

There you go again, getting all carried away. City (who had a great season) scraped the last promotion spot in the playoffs, to finally escape from the 4th division to the 3rd. That's all. I applaud them and I am pleased fro them but we play in the premier division of our sport not somewhere down in the lower leagues. It is an achievement, but escaping teh bottom division after many years of failure is not the "success" you suggest. the only additional factor last year was City's prominence due to their Cup run. They seem to have decided to reduce their prominence this season as they are already out of 2 cups.

Never! You don't say?! Well, I'm glad I was sitting down. An astonsihing insight. Has this ever happened before anywhere?

Of course, it is an irrelevance. It would only be relevant if the Bradford fans were like ball bearings on a tray, and would all roll from the City end to the Bulls end, or vice versa, depending which was higher. Actually, while tere is some overlap, it really doesn't work like that. If both teams were doing well then both teams would get good crowds. And in the past, have.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:01 pm  

BiffasBoys wrote:

I genuinely have no interest in the Bulls, but do wish them to survive & prosper. They have some great fans who are going through thin times.

What does concern me is that the mob now in control are, in my opinion as bad as, if not worse than the last lot.
A closed, secretive little clique who have no intention of being open & honest with the supporters they expect to sustain their business.

The disdain they are showing towards fans will come back to bite them very badly. Sutcliffe is a politician. Politicians by nature are liars, deceitful & evasive, appealing only to their core demographic to keep their jobs.
This is not the road to go down for the Bulls, in my opinion.

The Bulls need to have city wide, fresh, untainted appeal. Instead they have a politically incestuous, less than open & honest bunch with a patriarchal egomaniac at the head of it all.

Sutcliffe's boasts about investment from Qatar have come to zero. Jay Willey didn't seem to be around long. Kate Hardcastle hasn't uttered a word for a long time. This talk of a 14 person board is laughable.

I see the Bulls being outside of the top 6-8 clubs for quite some time to come.

But it's all we had. Come 1st September 2012, Guilfoyle was going to liquidate the club so he didn't have to find money for that month's wages.

I don't know these, I didn't know the last board, I see them both as suits at the top table. I believe what the current board say in the same way the I believed what the last did. Not because I'm gullible, but because that's all there is and in a way that doesn't matter to the majority of fans, most won't 'care' to find the difference between the truth and what we're told, they want the club to do well and are happy with the frontage, the facade, the spoonfed nature.

I could tell you a pack of lies and you may believe it, because you'd know no different. The context is almost irrelevant. It's a bit random but it's probably best how to explain it IMO.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:16 pm  

... and also, you could see why it was construed as trolling. Like gutterfax you say you have no interest in Bradford and yet are very vocal in the negative aspect of the thread.

Re: Winding up order ? : Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:24 pm  

M@islebugs wrote:

Biffa, I've quite enjoyed you but you're beginning to stretch it. For example,

"Vipin Joshi is also a director. Check out the Bradford regeneration organisation Khan, Greenwood & joshi are linked to. Got millions of Bradford Council money & is under investigation".

Which organisation?
In what way are the people you refer to linked to it?
How many 'millions' of Bradford Council money did they get?
Who is investigating?
What is being investigated?

Yours is an interesting thesis but I'm afraid it requires a tad more evidence than your offering. There can hardly be an adult in the country who doesn't have links to a club, charity, workplace where an investigation of some kind has taken place.

Do some research into Bradford Trident, what it was about, who was behind it, who earned from it, what it actually achieved etc etc.

Let me be quite clear, I have nothing against the Bulls team or it's supporters. I think they are being led a merry dance by a bunch of shysters.