Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:32 am  

I was in The Coral stand, looking down and I thought he bounced it which was then pounced on for the try. But I've only seen it once, at full speed

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 2:15 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Then maybe you are taking substances, as that's a bit far-out.

Seriously, change the record FA. Yet again, someone has a difference of opinion and you accuse them of "being on drugs/substances". You are a one-trick pony and it is getting very tiresome now. You DO realise that people are entitled to have an opinion don't you?

It is also a bit low to try and humiliate people by making comments such as these.

Perhaps you are missing Adey to help you wear people down?

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:02 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Seriously, change the record FA. Yet again, someone has a difference of opinion and you accuse them of "being on drugs/substances". You are a one-trick pony and it is getting very tiresome now. You DO realise that people are entitled to have an opinion don't you?

And I'm entitled to have an opinion on their opinion. That's the bit you miss.

mystic eddie wrote:

It is also a bit low to try and humiliate people by making comments such as these.

No, it's not, you need to look up "sarcasm".

mystic eddie wrote:

Perhaps you are missing Adey to help you wear people down?

Your other problem is that if any post is made in response, to anything that response always equals "trying to wear a person down". I find this a very strange concept. Someone else posts - that is never, to you, wearing anyone down. But I post - that IS, somehow, trying to wear someone down. Even by your standards of "logic", isn't that a bit contradictory?

Anyhoo, trying to work out WTF you're on about is wearing me down, so crack on.

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:36 pm  

You two argue like school children as I have seen previously - is that normal for this forum?

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 4:32 pm  

DrFeelgood wrote:

You two argue like school children as I have seen previously - is that normal for this forum?

I shouldn't get drawn in, but he keeps piling in with this gratuitous chip-on-the-shoulder shoite. I try to ignore it but ...

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 4:36 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I shouldn't get drawn in, but he keeps piling in with this gratuitous chip-on-the-shoulder shoite. I try to ignore it but ...

You could just put him on your block list

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:40 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Seriously, change the record FA. Yet again, someone has a difference of opinion and you accuse them of "being on drugs/substances". You are a one-trick pony and it is getting very tiresome now. You DO realise that people are entitled to have an opinion don't you?

It is also a bit low to try and humiliate people by making comments such as these.

Perhaps you are missing Adey to help you wear people down?

I really didn't take any offense at his post, I thought it were a little bit funny if I'm honest. The only way I may have taken a bit of offense is if I thought his opinion carried any weight.

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:15 pm  

DrFeelgood wrote:

You two argue like school children as I have seen previously - is that normal for this forum?

unfortunately yes. If you decide to stay on this forum you will appreciate that its not Eddie arguing with FA, but FA indiscriminately arguing with anybody in sight, and that casts a shadow across the forum that the "light touch" moderators refuse to lift. Woe betide the fresh new optimistic Bulls poster that makes a slight error even in grammar, FA will be straight down your throat. He knows everything, except what a Bullanker he is. A Bullot on the Fanscape.

And he admits he has no sense of humour. Add together the biggest volume of postings on this forum by FA and no sense of humour, equals run for your life Dr Feelgood, go join the Saints or Leeds (oops maybe not) forum. Or be prepared for venomous contempt from Far and Away up the Spectrum for an innocent comment.

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:22 pm  

The recent reference on this forum to Adey being a Bullmchum of FA is unfortunately misplaced. Adey is far too emotionally intelligent to be an FA Bullmchum, which is why he has not made a single post on this FA dominated forum for a long time. Remember, his Adey Icon was a FATroll-spray.

Re: 19/6/16 Bulls -v- Batley : Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:22 pm  

unfortunately Greg the issue is weight. if you are not in the FA clique you have to put up with the quantity and quality of his stream of Bullshit aimed at anyone in his sights. It really does get a bit wearing. And of course not challenged by his Bulmchums the moderators.