bowlingboy wrote:
.....................the RFL............Gotta love their progressive and constructive thinking.
You're right - I doubt anyone at Red Hall understands the words "progressive" and "constructive".
There cant be many sports whose governing body has such a poor (if any) business model.
In fact it wont be long before American Football in the UK gets more media coverage and fans than the RFL.
The powers that be are slowly strangling our sport of its future - and I dont just mean the Bulls - 15+ years ago the Super League marketed itself very well - it could have challenged some less well followed sports.
But look at it now - how often is Super League (never mind Rugby League in general) mentioned on national tv? But upcoming sports (womens football, womens cricket, Tour de Yorkshire) now get more coverage. Good on them, and they will have a more solid business foundation due to the already established (and thriving) models of their male/french baselines but they are still marketing themselves. BKB (Bare Knuckle Boxing) could overtake RFL soon!
Some may argue that the RFL's decision to bring in Toronto is "expanding the game" but come on they tried that before and it didnt work - London Harlequins, Wales Celtic Crusaders, Gateshead, Paris St Germain, - yes Catalan are still in the SL but does their existence prove that RFL has "expanded" into France?
The RFL business model (if they have one) and their constant restructuring of the leagues/promotion/relegation is not working.
Just bulldoze Red Hall and replace the top brass with some real business men before its too late