Enough is enough - Bulls 12 Hudds 16 : Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:30 pm  

I know I said I'd give it 10 games or so but the resolve has worn thin. Once again the problems which have blighted us for te last 18 months were evident again, How long can we go on listening to the same tired excuses week in week out. I'm sorry but the problem lies with once person who isn't getting the best out of the some of the parts he's working with.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:38 pm  

I agree with you. Why can't we get over the tryline? Defence was good again but if Macca doesn't work on the attack we will really struggle this season.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:39 pm  

What was the penalty count this evening?
And do you think maybe Huddersfield are a better side than you give them credit for?

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:42 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I agree with you. Why can't we get over the tryline? Defence was good again but if Macca doesn't work on the attack we will really struggle this season.

It certainly wasn't good tonight.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:43 pm  

Baron Greenback wrote:

What was the penalty count this evening?
And do you think maybe Huddersfield are a better side than you give them credit for?

No I don't.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:46 pm  

Baron Greenback wrote:

What was the penalty count this evening?
And do you think maybe Huddersfield are a better side than you give them credit for?

No, I don't think that's true. Bradford's forwards dominated the game, just as they did against HKR. The problem is just that, we've a very dominant pack there's just nothing backing them up. Players 1-6 are average at best. If you only had 1 or 2 average players in the backline you might not notice as the other players may take up the slack. But when you've a halfback pair who couldn't create toast with a a slice of bread and grill, wingers who couldn't catch cold and a fullback who's mind wanders so far that it brings back souviners then that is a team in trouble

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:48 pm  

Roofaldo wrote:

No, I don't think that's true. Bradford's forwards dominated the game, just as they did against HKR. The problem is just that, we've a very dominant pack there's just nothing backing them up. Players 1-6 are average at best. If you only had 1 or 2 average players in the backline you might not notice as the other players may take up the slack. But when you've a halfback pair who couldn't create toast with a a slice of bread and grill, wingers who couldn't catch cold and a fullback who's mind wanders so far that it brings back souviners then that is a team in trouble

It's not all bad though, our homegrown winger is riding high in the SL try-scoring charts.

Oh.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:52 pm  

Asim wrote:

It's not all bad though, our homegrown winger is riding high in the SL try-scoring charts.

Oh.

Did he even play.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:59 pm  

redeverready wrote:

No I don't.

Ah right, well that clarifies things. Thanks for the two points anyway.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:03 pm  

redeverready wrote:

Did he even play.

Yes.

For Wakefield