Isn't the big question.... : Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:25 am  

After beating us last night, I think the big question is...

Can you beat Wakefield on Monday?

[Bullseye]

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:27 am  

Always hard to back up after a big effort and Wakey are playing well. It'll be tough.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:32 am  

Bullseye wrote:

Always hard to back up after a big effort and Wakey are playing well. It'll be tough.

Totally agree, personally wouldnt be surprised to see us get beat by Salford. Personally I think the easter schedule is bit hectic for the players. Last nights game will of taken hell of a lot out of both sides.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:35 am  

vb1981 wrote:

Totally agree, personally wouldnt be surprised to see us get beat by Salford. Personally I think the easter schedule is bit hectic for the players. Last nights game will of taken hell of a lot out of both sides.

Yep last night was a real slog and the Easter schedule certainly is hectic! I think there will be a few upsets on Monday as it will probably come down to who handles two games in such a short space of time the best.

That said if ever a result would push us on to beat Wakey then last night was it, so fingers crossed.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:46 am  

Bullseye wrote:

Always hard to back up after a big effort and Wakey are playing well. It'll be tough.

It will, but if Lynch and Nero pull through they only played half a game. Platt didn't feature at all either.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:49 am  

Liane wrote:

It will, but if Lynch and Nero pull through they only played half a game. Platt didn't feature at all either.

Why was that?

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:49 am  

I'd be hugely impressed if we came out with maximum points from the Easter weekend. Going to Wakey is almost always a tough game for us and I expect it'll have plenty of tries due to fatigued players.

I wondered if we might have recalled Matt James to bring a fresh forward into the side. We will surely need to bring at least a couple of fresh legs into the team.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:52 am  

vb1981 wrote:

Why was that?

coz hes rubish

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:54 am  

Richard_bull wrote:

coz hes rubish

Oh God, here we go again!

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:30 am  

vb1981 wrote:

Why was that?

Because in a game so tight a momentary lapse of concentration could have cost the match.