Your starting- Full Back : Tue Dec 14, 2021 6:57 am  

Just for a bit of fun, I thought I'd see what we think will be our strongest line up this year (pending new arrivals).

First up is Full Back....

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Tue Dec 14, 2021 8:52 pm  

Please can you add an option for 'none of the above'

[Bullseye]

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Thu Dec 16, 2021 11:45 am  

I went for Hall but I've not seen him play. Chosen on the basis that Kear is a winger IMO and the rest are untried kids.

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Thu Dec 16, 2021 6:50 pm  

Hall for me also. Showed plenty of attacking prowess at Batley

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:45 am  

What are the chances of getting Jamie Shaul on dual reg. from Hull. (Slim I would say).

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:27 am  

Peter Goddard wrote:

What are the chances of getting Jamie Shaul on dual reg. from Hull. (Slim I would say).

He's been given squad number 29 - suggests he isn't likely to feature for them. Hull's squad looks even more wtf than ever. Scott Taylor at number 30? They look bottom 4.

[Bullseye]

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:01 am  

M@islebugs wrote:

He's been given squad number 29 - suggests he isn't likely to feature for them. Hull's squad looks even more wtf than ever. Scott Taylor at number 30? They look bottom 4.

Looking at the Hull squad it does look a mess. No halfback named at all. No wingers of any real note. Lots of mediocre players. Without a halfback they'll have to play Connor and Reynolds together and put Shaul back at fullback won't they?

Us going into dual reg with Hull deserves a separate thread, maybe some Hull fans might shed some light.

[Bullseye]

Re: Your starting- Full Back : Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:10 am  

Edit: Hull Signed Gale didn't they. That makes sense now!