Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:38 pm  

Leaguefan wrote:

:DOH:

No-one's bagged the ref, Cummings jr, so there is nothing for you to see here.

Ta-ta.

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:39 pm  

meast wrote:

boooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

boooooooooooooooooooooooooo




warringtons year again is it eddie

Eddie never tipped us this season.

HTH

Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:41 pm  

WireFanatic II wrote:

No-one's bagged the ref, Cummings jr, so there is nothing for you to see here.

Ta-ta.

You just do not see the irony do you, and your original post confirmed it.

Well sorry if it's beyond you but that's life.

Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:47 pm  

Leaguefan wrote: You just do not see the irony do you, and your original post confirmed it. Well sorry if it's beyond you but that's life. You keep thinking that, Kiddo, and I'll keep discussing RL without getting stressed everytime a match official is called names. Hey, why don't you make yourself useful for a couple of hours and visit this thread: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396698&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 ........you can let off a bit of steam in there. I expect to see you giving those Saints fans plenty of stick for bagging good old Smiffy.

Leaguefan wrote: You just do not see the irony do you, and your original post confirmed it. Well sorry if it's beyond you but that's life. You keep thinking that, Kiddo, and I'll keep discussing RL without getting stressed everytime a match official is called names. Hey, why don't you make yourself useful for a couple of hours and visit this thread: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396698&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 ........you can let off a bit of steam in there. I expect to see you giving those Saints fans plenty of stick for bagging good old Smiffy.

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:35 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

No one was trolling. Wakefield scored 8 tries, of those 3 were from kicks, one was an interception and two were soft tries where Ferguson barged over the line. That leaves two tries that took some creative play, Blaymire's second and George's try. Blaymire's was as much down to terrible defence as creativity on Wakefield's part although Martin did well to set it up, and I have already praised George's try. As I have said, Wakefield generally rely on kicks and poor defensive efforts to score, which is ok because on paper they don't have the players to break down other teams. I've already praised their kicking game, so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Are you trying to suggest that this is not the case and that Wakefield beat Warrington with flair and skill tonight?

So 8 tries created in a variety of different ways does that not show creativity? Is kicking not a vital skill in the game especially when used to 'create' tries? So in answer to your question yes Wakefield did beat Wire with flair and skill but also with hard graft and enthusiasm.

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:12 pm  

Wes Hooligan is the king of talking toss. Why give him the time of day?

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:25 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

What is funny, the fact that you have absolutely no counter argument and are making yourself look a fool? I can see why that is funny for everyone else but why are you laughing?

and it certainly isn't funny that every time wakey win you make a public t@@@ of yourself , its quite tragic .

Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:07 am  

WireFanatic II wrote: :lol: You keep thinking that, Kiddo, and I'll keep discussing RL without getting stressed everytime a match official is called names. Hey, why don't you make yourself useful for a couple of hours and visit this thread: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396698&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 ........you can let off a bit of steam in there. I expect to see you giving those Saints fans plenty of stick for bagging good old Smiffy. You REALLY do not get it do you!! Re read and try to COMPREHEND what was written initially. Then try to put into context with other posts (1000's). Then attempt to see where the humour was, and finally, and this is where you fall for the 3 card trick, put your initial comment on this thread into the equation. If you STILL cannot see the irony and how funny it is then so be it, but don't take it out on people just because your sense of humour is going awry.

WireFanatic II wrote: :lol: You keep thinking that, Kiddo, and I'll keep discussing RL without getting stressed everytime a match official is called names. Hey, why don't you make yourself useful for a couple of hours and visit this thread: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396698&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 ........you can let off a bit of steam in there. I expect to see you giving those Saints fans plenty of stick for bagging good old Smiffy. You REALLY do not get it do you!! Re read and try to COMPREHEND what was written initially. Then try to put into context with other posts (1000's). Then attempt to see where the humour was, and finally, and this is where you fall for the 3 card trick, put your initial comment on this thread into the equation. If you STILL cannot see the irony and how funny it is then so be it, but don't take it out on people just because your sense of humour is going awry.

Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:24 am  

Leaguefan wrote:

You REALLY do not get it do you!!

Re read and try to COMPREHEND what was written initially. Then try to put into context with other posts (1000's). Then attempt to see where the humour was, and finally, and this is where you fall for the 3 card trick, put your initial comment on this thread into the equation.

If you STILL cannot see the irony and how funny it is then so be it, but don't take it out on people just because your sense of humour is going awry.

Congratulations you win the thread!