: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:41 am  

roughyedspud wrote:

wow...

thats your best post on this thread

less is more.

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:45 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote: The same Michael Monaghan who played all his Canberra career at 7, went to Manly as a 7, played hooker for a season and a bit at Manly, had a storming last season at 7 while Orford was injured with Phil gould calling him the form halfback of the season and he should be playing for NSW? Gould mainly cherped on about him as a 9. I am not saying he is a bad 7 just that he seems to be a better 9. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-156911473.html

getdownmonkeyman wrote: The same Michael Monaghan who played all his Canberra career at 7, went to Manly as a 7, played hooker for a season and a bit at Manly, had a storming last season at 7 while Orford was injured with Phil gould calling him the form halfback of the season and he should be playing for NSW? Gould mainly cherped on about him as a 9. I am not saying he is a bad 7 just that he seems to be a better 9. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-156911473.html

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:03 pm  

Noel Cleal wrote: Gould mainly cherped on about him as a 9. I am not saying he is a bad 7 just that he seems to be a better 9. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-156911473.html http://www.rleague.com/db/player/m/mona ... /index.php

Noel Cleal wrote: Gould mainly cherped on about him as a 9. I am not saying he is a bad 7 just that he seems to be a better 9. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-156911473.html http://www.rleague.com/db/player/m/mona ... /index.php

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:30 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

thats your best post on this thread

less is more.

Shame you don't follow your own dictat it would be less embarrasing for you

as the saying goes

Better to say nothing and be thought a fool than open your mouth and be shown a fool

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:34 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

you need him badly and the club is certainly chasing him

According to you this is one of the power house attacking sides in the NRL?

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:58 pm  

Eccleshill Rhino wrote:

According to you this is one of the power house attacking sides in the NRL?

Jamie Lyon has won the MOS and also won the NRL title playing at 5/8th

in case you dont know, these indicate a player who is good.

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:13 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

in case you dont know, these indicate a player who is good.

Only good players with titles? You have heard of Ricky Bibey and Scott Naylor haven't you? I'm sure they have their Australian counterparts - ordinary players in successful sides.

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:40 pm  

Andy Gilder wrote:

Only good players with titles? You have heard of Ricky Bibey and Scott Naylor haven't you? I'm sure they have their Australian counterparts - ordinary players in successful sides.

NRL title.

edit : playmakers are very crucial in RL. to win a trophy in the nrl as a playmaker means you are a really good player..

funny how you ignored the MOS.

clearly you dont rate it

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:44 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

Jamie Lyon has won the MOS and also won the NRL title playing at 5/8th

in case you dont know, these indicate a player who is good.

Don't change the subject - according to you Canberra are one the best attacking sides in the NRL - which seems to conflict with some of the statements you are now making?

Preston Campbell won a NRL title playing at 6 - even by the widest stretch of the imagination could anyone call him a good player - Sean Rudder is another - Ben Iken another - not sure your arguement stands scrutiny!!

: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:46 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

NRL title.

edit : playmakers are very crucial in RL. to win a trophy in the nrl as a playmaker means you are a really good player..

funny how you ignored the MOS.

clearly you dont rate it

Lyon wasn't considered good enough to be a playmaker for Saints he was a centre when he won his MOS - a fact obviously lost in your desire to show what a fool you are