Re: Standard of SL : Sat Sep 10, 2022 6:33 pm  

Much better game! Salford, wow wee….how good have they done? Shows what good recruitment (coaches and players) does for a club. Wire take note and hang your heads in shame!

Re: Standard of SL : Sat Sep 10, 2022 6:51 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

Once Huddersfield beat Salford, St Helens will put Leeds back on their box

You think you're special? Saints putting Leeds in their box is like a one-eyed man beating the blind guy. It's nothing to be proud of. Leeds are sh*t. Saints are just the best sh*t team. The ''competition'' is total trash.

Re: Standard of SL : Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:02 pm  

DallasMead2 wrote:

Got to be an all time low, surely. Watching Leeds v Cas is painful, SO many mistakes and just seen the first points after 51 minutes. So poor…..

Definitely more to come.

Re: Standard of SL : Sat Sep 10, 2022 10:14 pm  

Rugby League can't become a top class sport in the UK with the way the game is currently run.

Super League is a failing competition.

We need to make it an ever lesser competition and go down the representative route instead.

We need to go into areas of Scotland, Wales and Ireland and build clubs and get into the Schools to build the game in those places. We need to create an annual 5 nations championships between the 4 home nations + France.

We also need to create an annual War of the roses 3 test series. Obviously we have problems of loyalty on the West of Pennines with that one but it must happen because it should.

The top players can make representive games their priority and play for their clubs when available.

A four year international calender should be as follows.

Year 1 Ashes series Great Britain vs Australia

Year 2 Tri nations series

Year 3 Ashes series Australia vs Great Britain

Year 4 World cup


Representative games are the only way forward. Seeing the best play against the best is what you need in any sporting competition.

Build it and they will come.


Or we could keep going with what we have now?

[Mild Rover]

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 7:22 am  

giddyupoldfella wrote:

Rugby League can't become a top class sport in the UK with the way the game is currently run.

Super League is a failing competition.

We need to make it an ever lesser competition and go down the representative route instead.

We need to go into areas of Scotland, Wales and Ireland and build clubs and get into the Schools to build the game in those places. We need to create an annual 5 nations championships between the 4 home nations + France.

We also need to create an annual War of the roses 3 test series. Obviously we have problems of loyalty on the West of Pennines with that one but it must happen because it should.

The top players can make representive games their priority and play for their clubs when available.

A four year international calender should be as follows.

Year 1 Ashes series Great Britain vs Australia

Year 2 Tri nations series

Year 3 Ashes series Australia vs Great Britain

Year 4 World cup


Representative games are the only way forward. Seeing the best play against the best is what you need in any sporting competition.

Build it and they will come.


Or we could keep going with what we have now?

I prefer a club based approach - like football rather than cricket or RU. But it is about what works rather than what I want, and I agree radical options have to be explored.

It is now a long time since GB/England beat Australia in a game, never mind a series. As you acknowledge, one side of the Yorks-Lancs rivalry is barely aware it exists. Seeds sown in Ireland and Scotland would take a long time give us green shoots - neither are populous countries and both are pretty crowded sports markets already.

If we go down the rep-focused route, I think we need another level between club rugby and the international game. Like in RU, where you have the Irish Provinces and the four Welsh pro clubs affiliated with local semi-pro clubs. Only 2 pro clubs in Scotland. They’ve done similar in the Southern Hemisphere in Super Rugby. However, I think we’d need to be less constrained by traditional or major boundaries to be able create a coherent and balanced competition that could appeal to both the core support and new audiences. That is what the WRU did. Mind you, they’re held in similar esteem to that a lot of us seem to have for the RFL (or the leadership of SL when it breaks away, periodically).

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 7:35 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

As you acknowledge, one side of the Yorks-Lancs rivalry is barely aware it exists.

You Yorkshire lads should get more passionate about where you come from then.

[Mild Rover]

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 8:43 am  

Egg Chasing wrote:

You Yorkshire lads should get more passionate about where you come from then.

It’s nice to know somebody on your side cares.

I liked the description of Yorkshire, by Londoners, I saw a while ago as being famous for puddings, terriers and tea (from Kenya, India and Sri Lanka) plus an intense one-way rivalry with neighbouring Lancashire. I just took the direction for granted, but I could be wrong.

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 9:08 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

It’s nice to know somebody on your side cares.

I liked the description of Yorkshire, by Londoners, I saw a while ago as being famous for puddings, terriers and tea (from Kenya, India and Sri Lanka) plus an intense one-way rivalry with neighbouring Lancashire. I just took the direction for granted, but I could be wrong.

You lot definitely seem more vociferous about it, but doesn't mean it isn't there. If we could get the players to buy into it the fans definitely would.

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 2:18 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

Once Huddersfield beat Salford, St Helens will put Leeds back on their box

The gift that just keeps on giving!

Never change LeBron.... you truly are "special"

Re: Standard of SL : Sun Sep 11, 2022 2:20 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

They won’t though. There is a reason Salford finished 6th and Hudds 3rd. I don’t rate hudds at all. They are just the best of a bad bunch but are so much better than Salford

Bump