: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:45 pm  

TARANIS wrote:

Source?

rlfans.com

or at least it was posted on here by yours truly.

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:51 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

rlfans.com

or at least it was posted on here by yours truly.

NaCl. But only a little bit of it.

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:06 pm  

TARANIS wrote:

NaCl. But only a little bit of it.

scientist huh.

that explains a lot.

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:09 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

scientist huh.

No, I'm not a scientist.

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:12 pm  

TARANIS wrote:

No, I'm not a scientist.

so you use chemical abbreviations in ordinary conversation.

ill bet the ladies love you

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:15 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

33 million is the real figure for the RUWC final.

and thats with a final in a very good time slot for england and france, and with england in the final.

lets see how many watch the nz final, especially if its australia vs NZ.

the success of this RLWC is that it tapped into the large TV markets in australia.

How many people watched the rugby league world cup final?

: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:57 pm  

Eurob0y wrote: How many people watched the rugby league world cup final? http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=386124

Eurob0y wrote: How many people watched the rugby league world cup final? http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=386124

: Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:40 am  

Eurob0y wrote:

How many people watched the rugby league world cup final?

38 million .


Minus one Euroboy !

: Sat Dec 06, 2008 7:26 am  

manly4ever wrote:

38 million .


Minus one Euroboy !

minus 0.5

you need to adjust for intelligence

: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:03 am  

dally messenger wrote:

minus 0.5

you need to adjust for intelligence