: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:06 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

you are thick

tim smith was a really good player at parra whose form was overshadowed by drinking problems

finch has played origin and not only that, kicked the winning field goal.

finch is also a good half back.

please, stop it, your killing me.

my sides are aching from all this laughter

That is why Parramatta were such a good side - Smith was rubbish - overhyped - he simply did not deliver on the field.

Finch is so good even Bird got the SOO gig before him - get a life at least watch a few games - you might educate yourself

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:15 pm  

Eccleshill Rhino wrote:

That is why Parramatta were such a good side - Smith was rubbish - overhyped - he simply did not deliver on the field.

Finch is so good even Bird got the SOO gig before him - get a life at least watch a few games - you might educate yourself

ill bet you didnt even know finch played origin.

and off the top of my head i think tim smith won a Dally M rookie of the year award as well.

when his form was good he was doing some amazing things at half back.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:16 pm  

Eccleshill Rhino wrote:

Guess how many ineffective/missed tackles he makes - in weeks 1 and 2 he has a 13% average for missed tackles!!!

nathan hindmarsh after round 2 was ranked 2nd in most tackles made in the nrl.

100 tackles in 2 games = average of 50.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:37 pm  

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/na ... 72381.aspx probably why Mason resorted to the drink!!

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/na ... 72381.aspx probably why Mason resorted to the drink!!

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:59 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

nathan hindmarsh after round 2 was ranked 2nd in most tackles made in the nrl.

100 tackles in 2 games = average of 50.

Just to make it simple for you.

Nathan Hindmarsh is not a stand off.

You have claimed earlier in this very thread that stand offs in the NRL make 30 tackles a game. All ER is asking you to do is to provide some evidence of this.

Stop avoiding the question by making statements about your laughter and answer it. Then people may start to take you a little serious.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:15 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

Just to make it simple for you.

Nathan Hindmarsh is not a stand off.

You have claimed earlier in this very thread that stand offs in the NRL make 30 tackles a game. All ER is asking you to do is to provide some evidence of this.

Stop avoiding the question by making statements about your laughter and answer it. Then people may start to take you a little serious.

the guy was making fun of nathan hindmarshs tackling you silly boy

if you are trying to derail something it helps to read the thread first.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:15 pm  

nathan hindmarsh isnt a what?

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:23 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

the guy was making fun of nathan hindmarshs tackling you silly boy

if you are trying to derail something it helps to read the thread first.

Yes that is on another tangent.

However, ER is attempting to clarify your point that stand offs in the NRL make 30 tackles a game. You said it, now can you back that up ?

If you can't then just accept that you were incorrect and exaggerating and stop avoiding the question. It is so obvious its embarrassing.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:38 pm  

dally,

Why do you think McGuire would not adapt as well as Ellis has, given that McGuire was a better defender (in terms of tackles % rate) than Ellis?

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:07 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

:lol:

you really are a bitter old twit.

if a player cant tackle - an essential skill in RL - then being called a speed bump is the least of their concerns.

ffs do you have any life other than the NRL!