: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:00 pm  

Oldham Rhino wrote:

8643

RIP Bullmania
x

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:00 pm  

Dave T wrote:

What disappoints me about Sky is the fact that because we batter Bradford tonight, they go on about how bad the Bulls were.

Clarke talked about it looking like a training session for us, yet they don;t say the same when Saints stick 58 on teams, they talk about how good Saints are. Idiots.

Bradford were poor, but no worse than any other team who get 58 stuck on them. We were very, very good tonight, and have lost games like this due to our incompetence.

When we beat you 60-8 the other week, we only heard about how bad Warrington were and didn;t get any credit.

Swings and roundabouts.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:00 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

No chance. Warrington were below average. Bradford were appalling and would have been beaten by a Championship side. Both teams will lose again next week.

And there we go, another example.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:02 pm  

Dave T wrote:

Next time you stick 58 on Bradford at their ground I will quote this post.

Any team who loses by 58 has been poor. Any team who wins by 36 away from home has been very good.

I know it is difficult for a Saints fan to look past their own team, but give it a go gateaux.

If that was Saints tonight, people would be saying that they knocked them off the park and were awesome, making Bradford poor. Because it was Warrington, Bradford must have been poor (ignoring the fact that this team beat Leeds 8 days ago).

Read the thread, its nothing to do with being a Saints fan but watching that game as a neutral neither team were exactly showing Super League at its best. Yes Warrington had some great moments in the game but for the most of it they were average any other team would have beaten you with ease, you still managed to concede 22 points against a team that was clueless.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:03 pm  

Dave T wrote:

Bradford have been dire all year, but teams haven't stuck 58 on them this year.

Maybe, just maybe, we deserve some credit. Aah, don't worry about it, it's not worth it.

see the bottom line of my post mate

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:04 pm  

Dave T wrote:

Next time you stick 58 on Bradford at their ground I will quote this post.

Any team who loses by 58 has been poor. Any team who wins by 36 away from home has been very good.

I know it is difficult for a Saints fan to look past their own team, but give it a go gateaux.

If that was Saints tonight, people would be saying that they knocked them off the park and were awesome, making Bradford poor. Because it was Warrington, Bradford must have been poor (ignoring the fact that this team beat Leeds 8 days ago).

The truth is Rugby League fans can't give credit where credit is due. They are incapable of doing it.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:05 pm  

Stooper wrote:

When we beat you 60-8 the other week, we only heard about how bad Warrington were and didn;t get any credit.

Swings and roundabouts.

I wouldn't expect a Bradford fan to accept tonight's defeat due to Wire playing well, that's not the way i works.

In terms of the pundits though, let's just compare it to the next time Saints or Leeds do this to a team.

It's clearly not worth getting into it here, as fans have made their mind up that Wire are crap, and that is all there is to it, but today IMO, we showed that when things stick, we can play.

When it comes down to it, Bradford were favourites tonight, most of you expected them to batter us. Clarke predicted a big win for Wire. Surprise surprise, when we win, it's becasue they were crap, and we were below average.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:06 pm  

WireFanatic II wrote:

The truth is Rugby League fans can't give credit where credit is due. They are incapable of doing it.

Rubbish !!

I would like to put on record that, I congratulate Bradford for being completely dire in tonight's match

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:07 pm  

Wire did what they had to do well, very polished and professional in attack, took their tries clinically and attacked the weaknesses in the Bulls side, on the downside for them they conceded some very soft tries themselves and a better team than the Bulls would have had a field day.

The Bulls were diabolical, but it shouldn't really be too much of a surprise to anyone who has watched the side over the last couple of years.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:07 pm  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

see the bottom line of my post mate

Fair enough, however it's faint praise. We didn't just take our chances, we had a great forwards game, our kicking was excellent, defence was pretty good, very good kick chase, great attacking structure, and few penalties and errors.

Anyway, looking forward to next week against your boys!