: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:54 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

It wasn't just this thread also, you kept mentioning Hull in the Ryan Baileys last game thread aswell.

You attempting to tell me what I can and not post about?

Good luck sunshine.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:55 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

i make fun of your RL team.

you start telling me i should see a hooker.

the best example of when someone cant handle a debate is resorting to stuff like that.

very amusing!

the best example of somebody who cant handle a debate is the above,

mainly because you have either contradicted yourself or arent really sure what the word 'debate' means, or you are pretending for comedic effect

come on dally you can do better than this, you used to be better at this, you have grown lazy,

being wrong and sticking to it regardless and desperately trying to change the subject or turn it into a little spat is down with the levels of Vastman and his ilk

you can do better, stop hiding behind the cheap shots and the defence of the smaller clubs fans desperate for anything

im very disappointed in you, bring back AP and Albert, yeah they trolled and ruined threads, but at least they were quality trolls

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:58 pm  

Glenn Morangie wrote:

You attempting to tell me what I can and not post about?

Good luck sunshine.

But why keeping bringing up Hull when the matter had nothing to do with them? It was more like a 'My dads bigger than your dad' argument!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:01 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

But why keeping bringing up Hull when the matter had nothing to do with them? It was more like a 'My dads bigger than your dad' argument!

So you are trying to tell me what I can and cannot post, I see...

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:04 pm  

Glenn Morangie wrote:

Merely that you've done nothing but slate Leeds or Leeds players yet you are hardly arguning from a position of strength are you.

I'm sure you'd love to have the team Leeds do.

The only player I have slated is Bailey, I think you have a fantastic team but don't think Bailey warrants a place in the 17 week in week out. Imo he is lazy, a coward when someone squares up to him and offers nothing in attack
I don't understand how those comments have anything to do with Hulls team.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:11 pm  

Glenn Morangie wrote:

So you are trying to tell me what I can and cannot post, I see...

I dont think he is.

Seems quite straight forward.

You say you havent brought up Hull in this thread.

A Unknown Superstar shows you that you have.

Game ,set and match to A Unknown Superstar

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:25 pm  

Is that simple isn't it! But for some people it isn't.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:29 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

The only player I have slated is Bailey, I think you have a fantastic team but don't think Bailey warrants a place in the 17 week in week out. Imo he is lazy, a coward when someone squares up to him and offers nothing in attack
I don't understand how those comments have anything to do with Hulls team.

With all due respect I trust the succesful coaches Tony Smith and Brian McLennan's opinions higher than yours. They think he's a good enough player to play in SL winning teams who am I to argue?

When you've led a team to a GF win then perhaps just perhaps your views may count for more than theirs.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:32 pm  

Glenn Morangie wrote:

With all due respect I trust the succesful coaches Tony Smith and Brian McLennan's opinions higher than some your's. They think he's a good enough player who am I to argue?

Thats why I said in my opinion!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:36 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Is that simple isn't it! But for some people it isn't.

Sure is,but i doubt he/she will see it.