: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:07 pm  

Credit where credit is due.You can only beat whats in front of you & they beat an unbelievably poor warrington side.I wouldnt pick a wakey player in any of my dream teams,but fair to them theyve started the season well.I thought theyed struggle

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:15 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.

You can only beat what's in front of you mate and if we can score 48 points without creating anything that can only be a good sign. To overcome the early loss of two hugely influential players and still win with any amount in hand is a credit to Kear and the players.

We may start to create a bit more when we have our 'creative' players on the park.. Brough, Leo-Latu, Grix, Rooney, Sculthorpe.. will all help us in that respect when they get back to match fitness.

Re: Wakefield vs Warrington... : Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:25 pm  

Leaguefan wrote:

No it's all Phil Benthams's fault.

It's definitely, absolutely NOT in any way whatsoever, the players!!!

The lttle darlings are wonderful.

Who mentioned anything about Bentham, Cummings jr?

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:43 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.

You sad little bitter cretin. Crawl back under the stone from where you crawled.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:50 pm  

Ive been told that bradford had their worst game in years tonight, they were p!ss poor in defence apparently.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:02 pm  

upthecats wrote:

You can only beat what's in front of you mate and if we can score 48 points without creating anything that can only be a good sign. To overcome the early loss of two hugely influential players and still win with any amount in hand is a credit to Kear and the players.

We may start to create a bit more when we have our 'creative' players on the park.. Brough, Leo-Latu, Grix, Rooney, Sculthorpe.. will all help us in that respect when they get back to match fitness.

Yep, I would agree with that. I was happy Wakefield won tonight.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:13 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.

I can't help myself here..... Did you watch the game? Did you think about what you typed?

I know its different on telly sometimes, but we scored a hatful - with 1 recognised ball player for 60 odd mins, we had 2 men limp off early not to return. We completely dominated the first 20 mins or so, creating pressure that lead to (granted a fairly weak to start with) defense cracking. As has already been pointed out, you can only beat whats infront of you and tonight (as we have 2 other times this year so far) did with relative ease - all things considered.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:29 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.

wakey were different class tonight if it had not been for bentham warrington would have been nild did you go

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:46 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.

Bitter wakey hating t*****R!

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:47 pm  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

Yep, I would agree with that. I was happy Wakefield won tonight.

Of course you were.