: Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:54 pm  

Catpisstastic wrote:

well it does cos you've basically told everyone that reads this forum that you're a fucktard

There is just no need to be aggressive and insulting, in a blatent attempt to get the thread locked. Can Wire fans not have a reasonable debate with opposition fans without resorting to swearing and insults?

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:00 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

There is just no need to be aggressive and insulting, in a blatent attempt to get the thread locked. Can Wire fans not have a reasonable debate with opposition fans without resorting to swearing and insults?

can wigan fans not post anything without it being complete crap?

ChrisPie2 wrote:

Why do you think that the statement requires your response anyway? It was merely stating that King will be welcome to take the field provided he avoids his on field antics to get opposition players sent off.
I don't see how that would automatically call for a response, from you or anybody else.

if you don't want ppl pulling you up then don't post complete crap like that, then cry for the mods.

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:06 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

There is just no need to be aggressive and insulting, in a blatent attempt to get the thread locked. Can Wire fans not have a reasonable debate with opposition fans without resorting to swearing and insults?

No.

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:07 pm  

Catpisstastic wrote:

can wigan fans not post anything without it being complete crap?



if you don't want ppl pulling you up then don't post complete crap like that, then cry for the mods.

It's my view on the situation that occured.

you chose to believe an alternate version, and you are entitled to do so.

Just because we share differing beliefs doesn't mean that you have a right to be aggressive and swear, this is a discussion forum where alternate comments are debated, not taken out onto the front lawn for a screaming contest.

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:08 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

It's my view on the situation that occured.

you chose to believe an alternate version, and you are entitled to do so.

Just because we share differing beliefs doesn't mean that you have a right to be aggressive and swear, this is a discussion forum where alternate comments are debated, not taken out onto the front lawn for a screaming contest.

Great post copy n paste that on the dire board.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:14 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

It's my view on the situation that occured.

you chose to believe an alternate version, and you are entitled to do so.

Just because we share differing beliefs doesn't mean that you have a right to be aggressive and swear, this is a discussion forum where alternate comments are debated, not taken out onto the front lawn for a screaming contest.

so you think matt king deliberately headbutted richie mathers forearm and then lay on the floor pretending to be unconscious and then didn't return to a game that was still in the balance therefore reducing his team to 16 players.


is that what you're saying, cos if its not please spell it out for st maca

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:15 pm  

St_Maca wrote:

Great post copy n paste that on the dire board.

They probably don't understand the concept of heterogenous opinions on there.

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:19 pm  

Catpisstastic wrote:

so you think matt king deliberately headbutted richie mathers forearm and then lay on the floor pretending to be unconscious and then didn't return to a game that was still in the balance therefore reducing his team to 16 players.


is that what you're saying, cos if its not please spell it out for st maca

No he didn't headbutt Mathers, but the high tackle was no worse than others which had gone unpunished, yet his dramatics would have got him an oscar which led to Mathers sending off.

If a player goes down that easily he shouldn't be on the rugby field. Ganson sent Mathers off for Kings cross eyed dramatic throw to the floor, not the tackle itself.

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:27 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

No he didn't headbutt Mathers, but the high tackle was no worse than others which had gone unpunished, yet his dramatics would have got him an oscar which led to Mathers sending off.

If a player goes down that easily he shouldn't be on the rugby field. Ganson sent Mathers off for Kings cross eyed dramatic throw to the floor, not the tackle itself.

good trolling, some will fall for it,

you will have to be a bit more subtle though for anyone but the idiots, as no one with half a brain, could really believe you think that

: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:27 pm  

ChrisPie2 wrote:

No he didn't headbutt Mathers, but the high tackle was no worse than others which had gone unpunished, yet his dramatics would have got him an oscar which led to Mathers sending off.

If a player goes down that easily he shouldn't be on the rugby field. Ganson sent Mathers off for Kings cross eyed dramatic throw to the floor, not the tackle itself.

To say he was dramatic is abit OTT with an injury of seriousness.