: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:27 pm  

Paul124897 wrote:

From where I was stood, the forearm hit the chin of Morrison which sent him to the floor for a good few minutes.

The ban was justified IMO, it certainly looked nasty.

About 30 seconds tops and he got up and ran back into the defensive line when he realised he wasnt getting a penalty.

Re: RFL disciplinary strikes again : Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:30 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

no no, your right, its all a big conspiracy so you lose against us next week,

hence the banning of that superstar Chev Walker and we are allowed to play the guy who is clearly our best player, much better than Mcguire, Burrow, Senior, Webb, Diskin, Buderus Lauitiiti, Peacock, Sinfield that world class creative fulcrum Ryan bloody Bailey

pull your head out of your booty, if this is a conspiracy, its a pointless and rubbish one

Rovers play Saints next week.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:12 am  

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:

About 30 seconds tops and he got up and ran back into the defensive line when he realised he wasnt getting a penalty.

Morrison was quite clearly groggy for a while after the hit. I said at the time if the KR attack had any sense then they'd run at him, only they didn't.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:32 am  

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

Re: RFL disciplinary strikes again : Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:48 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

So why is Ryan Bailey given only a warning letter for the same offence?

Out of interest, have you seen the Bailey offence? I haven't by the way.

Clearly the disciplinary panel were not of the opnion that both were guilty of the same offence, if having seen both incidents you disagree that the two were in fact different then thats one thing but clearly the panel disagree.

Walker was found guilty of striking with a raised forearm, Bailey, it appears, was guilty of having a raised forearm/elbow but not striking. The difference, in the opinion of the panel, is clear for all to see.

As above, if you have seen both and think that either Bailey was guilty of striking or that walker was not, fine, but they they have been adjudged to be 'guilty' of different offences, hence the difference in sentence.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:16 am  

Further evidence that everyone hates hull kr. Long may it continue

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:20 am  

mwildcats wrote:

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/0,25212,12532_4910891,00.html

how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

100% record for Wigan.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:56 am  

We always seem to get stiffed by the panel so I'm not surprised. good thing is we have an even better player to replace him!

[Kosh]

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:10 am  

JB Down Under wrote:

We always seem to get stiffed by the panel so I'm not surprised.

The link a few posts up shows that to be completely untrue.

JB Down Under wrote:

good thing is we have an even better player to replace him!

If he was better, surely he would have been picked in the first place.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:47 am  

mwildcats wrote:

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/0,25212,12532_4910891,00.html

how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

And a quick calculation done when bored at work:

Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel:

Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200%
Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160%
Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100%
St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100%
Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86%
Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80%
Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63%
Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60%
Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36%
Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%

They're out to get us I swear...