: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:48 pm  

The decision has now been made.

Time to let them get on with their lives.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:54 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

The decision has now been made.

Time to let them get on with their lives.

But sir i'm having too much fun winding people up

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:12 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

There was no evidence from the prosecution to say that either Pryce or Reardon forced their way in.

HTH

sporting life wrote:

The court heard full-back Reardon, whose contract with Warrington Wolves has been terminated as a result of the incident, separated from his wife in February last year and began divorce proceedings in May.

But he said he was "heartbroken" when friends told him Mrs Reardon was having a relationship with a new man, Damon O'Brien.

Reardon asked St Helens stand-off Pryce to accompany him to Mr O'Brien's flat so he could "see for himself".

The defendants, who had both been drinking, went to the flat but when neither Mrs Reardon nor Mr O'Brien opened the door, Reardon sent a text message to his wife's new boyfriend, claiming their young son was in hospital.

He then shoulder-charged the door, breaking the frame and the lock.

Not something you do when you have a key or welcomed in.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:14 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

There was no evidence from the prosecution to say that either Pryce or Reardon forced their way in.

HTH

So you were in court, and listened to it, then, did you?

Maybe you'd better dash a letter of to the Sporting Life, BBC etc. who are all reporting that:-

Reardon sent a text message to his wife's boyfriend, claiming their young son was in hospital.

He then charged the door, breaking the frame and the lock.

Unless of course on your planet, charging the door and breaking the frame and the lock doesn't count as forcing your way in?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:22 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

he is a foreign criminal.

We only let the ones in who want to f'ck us up, not the ones who want to entertain us and pay taxes

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:24 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

So you were in court, and listened to it, then, did you?

Maybe you'd better dash a letter of to the Sporting Life, BBC etc. who are all reporting that:-



Unless of course on your planet, charging the door and breaking the frame and the lock doesn't count as forcing your way in?

The prosecution offered no evidence

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:29 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

The prosecution offered no evidence

No need to when the defendant admits guilt.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:29 pm  

rover49 wrote:

We only let the ones in who want to f'ck us up, not the ones who want to entertain us and pay taxes

That could be argued.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:30 pm  

Eurob0y wrote: LOl what does imfamous mean? Googleit.

Eurob0y wrote: LOl what does imfamous mean? Googleit.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:31 pm  

Wadski wrote:

No need to when the defendant admits guilt.

In the breaking and entering charge i meant