Re: POLL Promotion and Relegation v Franchises. : Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:32 pm  

Geoff wrote:

Definitely the franchise system, for the long term future of the game.

All these new grounds springing up are a direct result of this system, as are the much improved youth development structures, particularly within those clubs that have previously been up and down like yo-yos, and had to rely on short-term signings to try to either gain promotion or avoid relegation.

Wow where`s the link to that.

What year did framing the future come into being?
What`s the overseas quota for SL clubs including exemptions ?
Youth structure.......Chuckles .... NRL pension funds from certain clubs.

[Dick Jones]

Re: POLL Promotion and Relegation v Franchises. : Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:10 pm  

HOw on earth can any Championship compete with the money the SL clubs get, if the money was shared between the team in all three leagues we would see fairly.

Re: POLL Promotion and Relegation v Franchises. : Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:39 pm  

Red Red Robin wrote:

If we still had P&R clubs would still be throwing money at imports, paying lip servce to youth development and possibly even less time to ground improvements. If it wasn't for the license system would Saints, Salford, Castleford and Wakefield be building or looking to build new stadiums? Would we have extended Craven Park?

Correct
Promotion and relegation doesnt work it doesnt do anything other than allow one crap club to be replaced by another crap club. oh and make the Ar$e end of the league look exciting in the last month of the Season........

franchising is an excellent idea it got Cas and Wakey off their backsides embarrassingly shuffling planning applications around in an effort to look good then they got told that Licences can be taken away if they dont pursue the works........ great stuff, so we will have two more new stadia as a direct result ...

the onlything wrong with Franchises is we look like dicks with the welsh farce. Plus Londons a bit crap too and should be ditched but somehow we bend rules for them.......

Re: POLL Promotion and Relegation v Franchises. : Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:49 pm  

crumble90 wrote:

There might be a 1.6 million salary cap but how many teams in super league are actually fulfilling it?

I reckon that if you were to put Leigh/Featherstone v Wakefield/Crusaders, there wouldn't be much more than 2 tries either way.

How many Championship teams are able to spend the full Championship salary cap? Obviously not Leigh for a start. Even if the bottom SL club were only spending half the cap and the top Championship were spending the full cap there would still be a huge gap of half a million pounds. Not to mention the larger overseas quota. You simply cannot have a playoff game like that when the leagues are so far apart in terms of the rules.

I think in a game to determine their survival in SL that Wakefield or Crusaders (even in their current sheeeet position) would stick 40 or 50 on Leigh or Fev.

[Sadfish]

Re: POLL Promotion and Relegation v Franchises. : Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:59 am  

So almost twice as many people favour P&R over other ideas.

Maybe the RFL should do some ground work with regards to what their consumers want?