: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:44 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

why not? send him on loan? put him on the transfer list?

or make it publicly known he wont be playing for the first team.

it easy to make excuses as why it is easier to bring in a player like Winterstein than to develop your own, the reason being is it is unarguably easier to do so, thats why wakefield are doing it

I only hope your not a financial director/company secretary.

Put him on the transfer list - for what reason - the fact he is an overseas player -- constructive dismissal springs to mind.

Make it known he wont be playing first team - for what reason - the fact he is an overseas player -- constructive dismissal springs to mind.

Release from his contract and pay it up - makes real financial sense that one.

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:48 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

I only hope your not a financial director/company secretary.

Put him on the transfer list - for what reason - the fact he is an overseas player -- constructive dismissal springs to mind.

Make it known he wont be playing first team - for what reason - the fact he is an overseas player -- constructive dismissal springs to mind.

Release from his contract and pay it up - makes real financial sense that one.

excuses excuses

this is the reason you have ended up with an average squad made up of 11 overseas players because wakefield are scared of making the hard decisions,

if you dont need one of your overseas players then you can release him/transfer list him/drop him

if you do need 11 overseas players in your 11th year of SL it is a pathetic effort

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:49 pm  

I cant believe we have people tring to show this baboons ar5e why he is so damned thick, let him get back to touching his cousins.

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:57 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

excuses excuses

this is the reason you have ended up with an average squad made up of 11 overseas players because wakefield are scared of making the hard decisions,

if you dont need one of your overseas players then you can release him/transfer list him/drop him

if you do need 11 overseas players in your 11th year of SL it is a pathetic effort

Who cares we're still their against all the odds. Happy days!

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:05 pm  

Wakefields 19 man squad for Sunday has 12 British players in it.

Thats without Rooney, Brough and Moore.

Sorry to pinch your post J.T.

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:06 pm  

The Clan wrote:

Wakefields 19 man squad for Sunday has 12 British players in it.

Thats without Rooney, Brough and Moore.

Sorry to pinch your post J.T.

No point in posting facts it gets in the way of a good argument.

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:09 pm  

The Clan wrote:

Wakefields 19 man squad for Sunday has 12 British players in it.

Thats without Rooney, Brough and Moore.

Sorry to pinch your post J.T.

thats still 7 overseas players, hardly an acheivement

and whats the need for the other 5 who arent playing? if they arent needed then why keep them on, or are they just injured?

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:10 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

excuses excuses

this is the reason you have ended up with an average squad made up of 11 overseas players because wakefield are scared of making the hard decisions,

if you dont need one of your overseas players then you can release him/transfer list him/drop him

if you do need 11 overseas players in your 11th year of SL it is a pathetic effort

I have answered your questions as to why you cant just release someone/make it public that they wont be in the first team,not with excuses but with realistic implications of what happens if you do this.

As ever you come up with these ideas,but put very little thought into the implications of your ideas.

Please think through any future ideas you recommend.

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:19 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

I have answered your questions as to why you cant just release someone/make it public that they wont be in the first team,not with excuses but with realistic implications of what happens if you do this.

As ever you come up with these ideas,but put very little thought into the implications of your ideas.

Please think through any future ideas you recommend.

read it again,

if you have the players in reserve, if you have the players you need and you dont need the overseas players, you are perfectly able to offload them,

its natural and what teams generally do, they offload players they dont need, wakefield can do this too

unless of course they do need to have 11 overseas players in their squad to compete which is frankly a p'sspoor effort

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:23 pm  

J.T wrote:

No point in posting facts it gets in the way of a good argument.

Ah the credo of many wakey posters.

7 overseas in the 19. Like many clubs we could not do that at the Giants - not enough non UK players.

Clearly with Scully 2 weeks away what Wakey really needed was a reserve grade NRL player.