: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:00 pm
vastman wrote:
I love the way after years of under achieving you do marginally better in your opinion than Wakefield and you feel the need to go all superior. What a set of losers this particular band of Hudds fans are.
Personally I see nothing at Hudds to suggest anything special, just a lot of bullsh*t from some.
As for chucking dirt first don't be so pathetic, an utterly pointless thread started by one of your mates. You know Danril the sort Hudds used to get that wounded you so much in the past. Funny isn't it when things change some people quickly forget where they came from. This is why the attitude of some Hudds fans makes me feel sick to the pit of my stomach.
Let's hope for your sake your benefactor stays around a while otherwise you may see yourself back on the wrong side of the tracks very quickly. The day that happens I won't shed a tear - well not for you and your cronies.
You know what big man, I've torn apart every pathetic post you've made in this thread. Ignoring the content of my posts doesn't mean they haven't happened you know. And again you poke at my lot instead of focussing on your real issues and your own problems. It's a safe bet to say without Ken Davy we wouldn't be where we are but ATEOTD if the dog hadn't stopped to s*t he would have caught the rabbit wouldn't he. Our dog kept running this time, yours parked it's breakfast. That doesn't alter the fact however that you're trying to drag us down with inaccurate statements about mergers, supporters etc. The last bitter ramblings of a rather desperate, mentally challenged and bitter individual. All the barbs don't really matter son because they come from you. The biggest joke on the forum! A legend in his own lunchtime!
Like I say, don't worry about us. Ken's doing all he can to ensure we are a sustainable and attractive proposition long after he's gone and whilst we're grateful for his input and you're quite clearly green with envy there's not much I can do about it apart from being grateful to the man.
Congratulations on reducing the number of overseas players in your starting XVII from 14 to 7/8, or whatever it is. In the meantime practise what you preach and stop being such a hypocrite. A big ask for you I know, but you might as well set stiff targets!