Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:51 pm  

Roofs wrote:

London will get bailed out, they always do.

And London will continue to produce twice as many local players as Hull KA, they always do.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:15 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

And London will continue to produce twice as many local players as Hull KA, they always do.

Not entirely true. They probably produce the same amount. However London throw theirs in the starting line up whether they are good enough or not.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:49 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

NAH...You're mistaking us for Bradford

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 4:21 pm  

LifeLongHKRFan wrote:

Not entirely true. They probably produce the same amount. However London throw theirs in the starting line up whether they are good enough or not.

Oh I see, Hull KA are producing loads of players, they're just not playing pro-RL. Great.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:04 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

Oh I see, Hull KA are producing loads of players, they're just not playing pro-RL. Great.

I think his point was more akin to that London and Rovers were likely producing similar amounts of a similar quality, however London were having to blood those in light of no other options.

Rovers youth record is not great and our overuse of imports has maybe not endeared ourselves to you and certain others who don't like what we have done (I get that). However whether HKR has produced 0 or 50 SL standard players since reaching SL, I can't see how it would change London's current plight.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:23 pm  

RoverAndOut wrote:

I think his point was more akin to that London and Rovers were likely producing similar amounts of a similar quality, however London were having to blood those in light of no other options.

Rovers youth record is not great and our overuse of imports has maybe not endeared ourselves to you and certain others who don't like what we have done (I get that). However whether HKR has produced 0 or 50 SL standard players since reaching SL, I can't see how it would change London's current plight.

Hardly worth shouting about London's youth development if you're a KA fan then? Which was my point.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:31 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

Hardly worth shouting about London's youth development if you're a KA fan then? Which was my point.

You brought up youth development and used the old HKA as a dig back against someone who (tongue in cheek) said something about London needing a bail out... Someone responded that London's youth development was (as you would say) "hardly worth shouting about" in comparison to ours, which was your point and why we got were we are.

Either way neither are anything special. Back on topic I hope things look up for London and their supporters as it is never nice to have things like this hanging over a club.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:56 pm  

RoverAndOut wrote:

You brought up youth development and used the old HKA as a dig back against someone who (tongue in cheek) said something about London needing a bail out... Someone responded that London's youth development was (as you would say) "hardly worth shouting about" in comparison to ours, which was your point and why we got were we are.

Either way neither are anything special. Back on topic I hope things look up for London and their supporters as it is never nice to have things like this hanging over a club.

The banter on here's gone right down hill recently.

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:59 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

The banter on here's gone right down hill recently.

't'as that lad!

Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:25 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

't'as that lad!

In the glory days Id have got pages of fun from KR fans for a cheap shot like that.