: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:30 pm  

Danril wrote:

I would but seeing as I'm 100% right and you're a thick no mark piece of nothing I wont waste any more time apart from laughing at how stupid you are. I'll wait until you accept what a waste of a spot in SL you truly are...


<holds breath>

If you can't handle a beer without becoming an obnoxious, biggoted egomaniac with delusions of superiority you should go back to drinking alchopops with the other chavs.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:33 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

:D The wonderful irony

I fail to see the irony in the comment, can you please explain?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:21 pm  

Richard1 wrote:

IMO it is not just reserve grade players that clog up our game. The older end NRL players need looking at also in my opinion. There are not many teams about that dont have overseas players in that they could do without in favour of a homegrown player. I think that only top line, in their prime overseas stars should be brought in full stop. In Wakefields defence a couple of years ago we gave chances to the likes of Blaymire, Fox, Golden, Moore and Bibey when they were written off or in the lower leagues. On here one Hudds fan said it would not work. Most of them are now are SL regulars. Without their chance that Wakey gave them most of these would still be in the lower leagues IMO.

so you can't name all 90% of clubs. Okay.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:22 pm  

stantrin wrote:

by that answer i presume not many if any!!!!!

Not at all. from my answer you should get off your ar5e if you want something researching. HTH.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:23 pm  

The Clan wrote:

I fail to see the irony in the comment, can you please explain?

Of course you fail to see it. Which makes it even more ironic! [You couldn't make this up ]

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:40 pm  

The Clan wrote:

If you can't handle a beer without becoming an obnoxious, biggoted egomaniac with delusions of superiority you should go back to drinking alchopops with the other chavs.

I have no desire you join you so you crack on on your own.

I can't help being better than you, it's just the hand you and I were dealt.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:01 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

Of course you fail to see it. Which makes it even more ironic! [You couldn't make this up ]

So get on and explain then,
or is just more of your unfounded b()llocks.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:05 pm  

Danril wrote:

I have no desire you join you so you crack on on your own.

Good because like many others I'm tired of Reading the crap you write.

Danril wrote:

I can't help being better than you, it's just the hand you and I were dealt.

Like I said
Get over yourself

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:18 pm  

You know, one of the classic signs of a poster losing the argument is when he tries to involve others in his posts and speak for them too.

Not that it was ever an argument in the first place. A walkover is perhaps a more accurate description.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:33 pm  

Danril wrote:

You know, one of the classic signs of a poster losing the argument is when he tries to involve others in his posts and speak for them too.

Not that it was ever an argument in the first place. A walkover is perhaps a more accurate description.