: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:02 pm  

cadoo wrote:

We were however pulled out because he proved to expensive and we couldn't
fit him under the cap. So made the more sensible move to sign George Carmont who is on a lot less than Matt King and so far his stats are far better than King's.

so, matt king or george carmont? who d'ya want in your team?

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:03 pm  

PsychoBabble wrote:

Welcome back, didn't hear much from you after the Wire match and then total invisibility after Good Friday but clearly your teams' devastation of HKR on Monday has brought out the best in you.
For the record I think I speak for the majority of Wire fans when I say what a t!t we all think you are. I appreciate you will respond with the old "another bite" response but I am equally certain in my judgement that you are the David Vaeliki (sp) of this forum.

Didn't go anywhere

Oh and like i care what all you wire fans think

And yes it is a bite thank you

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:06 pm  

wire74 wrote:

so, matt king or george carmont? who d'ya want in your team?

Taking into consideration wages the two players are on and their stats so far.

George Carmont.

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:09 pm  

cadoo wrote:

Put it this way I am more happy with the start George Carmont has made and the wage he is on. Compared to the start Matt King has made and the wage he is on.

Matt kings basic wage per season in pounds sterling is?

George Carmonts basic wage per season in pounds sterling is?

And the proof of such wages is where? (please provide link)

I'll work out the difference for you.

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:14 pm  

cadoo wrote:

Taking into consideration wages the two players are on and their stats so far.

George Carmont.

so you're happy with georgie, i'm more than happy watching matt king in the p+b. win/win situation. we're all happy (except for dico, i think )

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:15 pm  

king piemon wrote:

Is it me or is he a waste of money?

He's done nothing this season and is injured most of the time

I think he's on a holiday

I am very confident that when the weather gets better and the pitches get better...Matt King will ram this statement down your fat pie eating neck

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:19 pm  

BelleVueLifer wrote: Matt kings basic wage per season in pounds sterling is? George Carmonts basic wage per season in pounds sterling is? And the proof of such wages is where? (please provide link) I'll work out the difference for you. Matt king is 1.3 million over 4 years. As for Carmont Wigan announced they had 140K on the cap and signed Mathers and Karl Pryce and in addition Carmont. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/wigan/7115051.stm "His try-scoring ability and excellent defensive qualities add value and strength to our back line without breaking the bank."

BelleVueLifer wrote: Matt kings basic wage per season in pounds sterling is? George Carmonts basic wage per season in pounds sterling is? And the proof of such wages is where? (please provide link) I'll work out the difference for you. Matt king is 1.3 million over 4 years. As for Carmont Wigan announced they had 140K on the cap and signed Mathers and Karl Pryce and in addition Carmont. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/wigan/7115051.stm "His try-scoring ability and excellent defensive qualities add value and strength to our back line without breaking the bank."

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:22 pm  

cadoo wrote: Matt king is 1.3 million over 4 years. As for Carmont Wigan announced they had 140K on the cap and signed Mathers and Karl Pryce and in addition Carmont. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/wigan/7115051.stm "His try-scoring ability and excellent defensive qualities add value and strength to our back line without breaking the bank." was this actually made public? (serious question)

cadoo wrote: Matt king is 1.3 million over 4 years. As for Carmont Wigan announced they had 140K on the cap and signed Mathers and Karl Pryce and in addition Carmont. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/wigan/7115051.stm "His try-scoring ability and excellent defensive qualities add value and strength to our back line without breaking the bank." was this actually made public? (serious question)

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:23 pm  

Oxford Exile wrote:

I am very confident that when the weather gets better and the pitches get better...Matt King will ram this statement down your fat pie eating neck

When will that be? May , June?

Do you really want a player on that much money to only be performing a quarter of the season?

Carmont can play on any pitch regardless of the weather. Why can't King?

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:23 pm  

wire74 wrote:

was this actually made public? (serious question)

It was and I am trying to find the link.

It was on foxsports I think.