: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:44 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

demographics are fairly similar.

indeed studies have shown in RL vs RU that the demographics dont vary too much on TV for club games.

indeed it costs more to advertise during SL games than the GP.

do your research

does it, do you have any evidence for this? or even a basic understanding of how advertising on sky sports is sold?

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:30 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

demographics are fairly similar.

indeed studies have shown in RL vs RU that the demographics dont vary too much on TV for club games.

indeed it costs more to advertise during SL games than the GP.

do your research

Not that I have a clue about how much advertising costs on Sky Sports, or the whether the demographics are similar; but doesn't it kind of prove my point that it isn't just about viewing figures?

Is there any evidence of the demographics being similar for that matter? Or that it costs more for SL advertising than GP?

I find it very hard to believe that RL gets less than other sports because we just don't know how to negotiate very well.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:33 am  

SmokeyTA wrote:

does it, do you have any evidence for this? or even a basic understanding of how advertising on sky sports is sold?

stick to trolling smokey under your various alias this debate isnt for you

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:35 am  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Not that I have a clue about how much advertising costs on Sky Sports, or the whether the demographics are similar; but doesn't it kind of prove my point that it isn't just about viewing figures?

Is there any evidence of the demographics being similar for that matter? Or that it costs more for SL advertising than GP?

I find it very hard to believe that RL gets less than other sports because we just don't know how to negotiate very well.

it was reported on TRL re advertising rates by a well know RL journalist about the fact that it costs more to advertise during SL games than GP.

there was another story on there about the number of AB demographics (or whatever the "good" demogrpahics are) that RL actually has the same as union for club games)

there was a story reported from some people at sky on the difference between RU & RL negotiators.

RL guys would take the first offer then be in the pub with them after wards, whilst the union guys would negotiate for weeks.

RL in england has double the viewers RU does and it costs more to advetise during a RL game than a RU game, why does RL get less then?

if the demographics of union were so much better why does RL have higher advertising rates.

teh situation in Oz is because the game is part owned by a company that also part owns our TV broadcaster.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:21 am  

dally messenger wrote:

stick to trolling smokey under your various alias this debate isnt for you

swing and a miss Dally,

are you going to answer the question, or just ignore it because it shows you up

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:21 am  

dally messenger wrote:

it was reported on TRL re advertising rates by a well know RL journalist about the fact that it costs more to advertise during SL games than GP.

there was another story on there about the number of AB demographics (or whatever the "good" demogrpahics are) that RL actually has the same as union for club games)

there was a story reported from some people at sky on the difference between RU & RL negotiators.

RL guys would take the first offer then be in the pub with them after wards, whilst the union guys would negotiate for weeks.

RL in england has double the viewers RU does and it costs more to advetise during a RL game than a RU game, why does RL get less then?

if the demographics of union were so much better why does RL have higher advertising rates.

teh situation in Oz is because the game is part owned by a company that also part owns our TV broadcaster.

the answer is, you are clearly making this up

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:33 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

swing and a miss Dally,

are you going to answer the question, or just ignore it because it shows you up

sorry mr phallus im not answering your questions or those posed by any aliases.

save the long winded replies for someone else because i couldnt be em

see ya

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:04 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

sorry mr phallus im not answering your questions or those posed by any aliases.

save the long winded replies for someone else because i couldnt be em

see ya

even bigger swing, even bigger miss, you're 3 for 3, can you go on

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:14 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

even bigger swing, even bigger miss, you're 3 for 3, can you go on

no

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:40 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

no

Thank God for that!