: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:13 pm  

Damo-Leeds wrote:

At least I’m trying to do something rather than wait for others to do something. In fact I’ll be emailing my local MP tomorrow and see if he can help get this off the ground with some funding. I’ll also be getting in touch with the sky sports team via my sisters connections.

If anyone things that this is a good idea what I’m doing here then say AYE!



Still there’s too many who sing hate songs! Ask The Bradford fans about they ginger idiot. He just takes his trouble to away grounds these days after he was banned from Odsal for causing trouble in the away bit. Banning people will only send the trouble elsewhere.

Surely even you can't compare the throwing bottles to singing "hate" (normally very lighthearted) songs surely?

And its up to the clubs to work together to ensure the bans are game wide

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:14 pm  

gateaux wrote:

Surely even you can't compare the throwing bottles to singing "hate" (normally very lighthearted) songs surely?

And its up to the clubs to work together to ensure the bans are game wide

no more sheep songs

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:16 pm  

Wire_Yed_79 wrote:

no more sheep songs

You will have to ask Damo, I think he has a list of which songs are acceptable!

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:21 pm  

gateaux wrote:

Surely even you can't compare the throwing bottles to singing "hate" (normally very lighthearted) songs surely?

Hate songs are not nice to hear and throwing bottles are not nice to see. The only difference is people see bottle throwing as more offensive than hate songs because bottle throwing can result in an injury. Hate songs no one’s getting hurt so its ok by some people.

But the truth is as fans we should want neither in the game and there’s no harm in setting up a campaign for the fans ran by the fans.

And its up to the clubs to work together to ensure the bans are game wide

The clubs are trying they best by putting out loud speaker messages, adding extra security and CCTV. But its obviously not working as well as it should be.

All I’m doing is trying a harmless approach that will encourage healthier behaviour on match days and reward it. Surely you wouldn’t mind a lollypop for been a model fan Sarah?

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:24 pm  

Damo-Leeds wrote:

Hate songs are not nice to hear and throwing bottles are not nice to see. The only difference is people see bottle throwing as more offensive than hate songs because bottle throwing can result in an injury. Hate songs no one’s getting hurt so its ok by some people.

But the truth is as fans we should want neither in the game and there’s no harm in setting up a campaign for the fans ran by the fans.



The clubs are trying they best by putting out loud speaker messages, adding extra security and CCTV. But its obviously not working as well as it should be.

All I’m doing is trying a harmless approach that will encourage healthier behaviour on match days and reward it. Surely you wouldn’t mind a lollypop for been a model fan Sarah?

Again you can't compare the two Damo.

And I am afraid I can't be coz I am a naughty girl and I sometimes swear at games or sing songs with naughty words in

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:25 pm  

gateaux wrote:

Again you can't compare the two Damo.

And I am afraid I can't be coz I am a naughty girl and I sometimes swear at games or sing songs with naughty words in

The referee's a banker

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:29 pm  

gateaux wrote:

Again you can't compare the two Damo.

Is that because you said so? Both are very similar its just that ones viewed as the more servere act of vulgarity.

And I am afraid I can't be coz I am a naughty girl and I sometimes swear at games or sing songs with naughty words in

Good for you. Bet you wanted me to tell you off but it would be a waste of time as your one of a few people on here who can’t separate Damo the troll from Damo the peace activist.

One more question then my sister wants on the TV.

Its ok for you to break a clubs request of positive behaviour but not others?

You’re a bit hypocritical IMO.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:30 pm  

Throw the book at 'em.

Oh the irony...

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:30 pm  

Damo-Leeds wrote:

Is that because you said so? Both are very similar its just that ones viewed as the more servere act of vulgarity.



Good for you. Bet you wanted me to tell you off but it would be a waste of time as your one of a few people on here who can’t separate Damo the troll from Damo the peace activist.

One more question then my sister wants on the TV.

Its ok for you to break a clubs request of positive behaviour but not others?

You’re a bit hypocritical IMO.

keep it up damo.

If you can't see the difference between a bit of swearing and throwing things on the field then I think its you with the problem

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:45 pm  

peter parker wrote:

Again, before you jump in with a load of nonsense about how I am condoning the crowd reaction, I'm not. It was unacceptable. What I am saying is human beings react to events with emotion.
Event - rubbish ref
Emotion - anger
Result - aggression

There's the solution then. Castleford supporters must undergo an anger management course before being handed their ticket.

There are plenty of ways to deal with emotions such as anger and frustration. Aggression should be way down the priority list for any civilised individual.