Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:33 am  

rugby league was bigger in nz in 1990 than it is now, there were couple thousand more registered players than there are now about 20,000 0r so. Aussie league began being shown on free to air tv in 1989 after the canberra/blamain grand finak in 1990 they were showing 3 games a week. as well as tha test matches, uk challenge cup final and and local lion red national club final were on tv.

wanui vs upper hutt grand final was huge 10,000 at the basin reserve! fox memorial in auckland and canterbury also had similar grand final crowds. auckland vs wellington and canterbury rep pgames got crowds of several thosand. kiwi's beat oz in melbourne and then ritichie balckmore famous "mening i'll get u meninga" ads were on tv to promote other 2 test in series (which we got smashed in by the way) everyone was talking about dean lonergan get samshed an doing the spastic shakes on the ground an getting up to play on!

i could keep going on gutterfax and i dont wont to be rude to you but i dont think you know what your talking about!
league playing numbers have always gone up and down and league has been able to attract good crowds albiet in cycles if not consistenlty!

i remember visiting my grandad in auckland in 1990 when he heard i liked rugby league he said i see they are saying rugby league could be the no1 sport in nz i remember when they were saying that in the 1950's. my grandad was scottish immigrant to nz never played himself but my father and uncles all played league as kids in 1950's becuse he took tham along to the local club!


league has never been as big as union in nz and at time the participation rate has slipped to worring levels, but when it has had good administration backed with decent top level results it has always captured nz sporting public's attention. league has always had a hardcore diehard following in nz. has always been in the top 1 - 5 ranked spectator sports. and has beenranked number 1 tv sport on many occasions!

to sum it up when people play informal contact rugby in school at lunchtime after school 90% of the time it's a game of rugby league! discrimination by school systems partly because of union supporters and partly becasue league had/has a bad rep as a game for coal miners, bouncers, truck drivers, gang members, etc has stopped its growth combined with long periods of poor administration have seen games fortune fluctuate dramatically!

gutterfax im a bit vexed off at your post to be honest where you in new zealand or wellington in 1990?

Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:37 am  

kiwi's 13-6 wrote:

rugby league was bigger in nz in 1990 than it is now, there were couple thousand more registered players than there are now about 20,000 0r so. Aussie league began being shown on free to air tv in 1989 after the canberra/blamain grand finak in 1990 they were showing 3 games a week. as well as tha test matches, uk challenge cup final and and local lion red national club final were on tv.

wanui vs upper hutt grand final was huge 10,000 at the basin reserve! fox memorial in auckland and canterbury also had similar grand final crowds. auckland vs wellington and canterbury rep pgames got crowds of several thosand. kiwi's beat oz in melbourne and then ritichie balckmore famous "mening i'll get u meninga" ads were on tv to promote other 2 test in series (which we got smashed in by the way) everyone was talking about dean lonergan get samshed an doing the spastic shakes on the ground an getting up to play on!

i could keep going on gutterfax and i dont wont to be rude to you but i dont think you know what your talking about!
league playing numbers have always gone up and down and league has been able to attract good crowds albiet in cycles if not consistenlty!

i remember visiting my grandad in auckland in 1990 when he heard i liked rugby league he said i see they are saying rugby league could be the no1 sport in nz i remember when they were saying that in the 1950's. my grandad was scottish immigrant to nz never played himself but my father and uncles all played league as kids in 1950's becuse he took tham along to the local club!


league has never been as big as union in nz and at time the participation rate has slipped to worring levels, but when it has had good administration backed with decent top level results it has always captured nz sporting public's attention. league has always had a hardcore diehard following in nz. has always been in the top 1 - 5 ranked spectator sports. and has beenranked number 1 tv sport on many occasions!

to sum it up when people play a contact rugby at lunchtime at school after school 90% of the time it's a game of rugby league! discrimination by school systems partly because of union supports and partly becasue league had a bad rep as a game for coal miners, bouncers, truck drivers, gang members, etc has stopped its growth combined with long periods of poor administration have seen games fortune fluctuate dramatically!

gutterfax im a bit vexed off at your post to honest where you in new zealand or wellington in 1990?

He has no idea...

End of story.

Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:56 am  

with the expansion of the salary cap to 6 million the warriors will be in a position to raid the S14 at will.

together with improving their finances it will improve RL no end

if you are a kid in nz now, you will be looking at people like benji marshall to emulate

Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:13 am  

Yeah thank God it is now so different to the bad old days of 1990.

Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:14 am  

gutterfax were you aware that when aussie league expanded to have teams in auckland, perth, north queensland and 2nd brisbane side, wellington dolphins bid just missed out, wellington side were jacking up games against nrl side like canberra. super league war and resulting bad media coverage, poor warriors results after being overhyped and failing to deliver the hype, and bad administration and incidents such as a drive by shooting occuring at wellington grand final, saw game go downhill in wellington after the mid 1990's.

Re: Wellington : Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:45 am  

a 2nd nz nrl side is a matter of time

if it wasnt for the sl war wed already have it

queensland and nz are where well go too next

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:24 am  

BTW, the official regions of New Zealand Rugby League:-

1. Northland (comprising Far North, Bay of Island, Whangarei).
2. Auckland.
3. Waikato.
4. Bay of Plenty.
5. Gisborne - East Coast.
6. Taranaki.
7. Hawkes Bay.
8. Manawatu.
9. Wellington.
10. Nelson Marlborough.
11. Canterbury.
12. West Coast.
13. Otago.
14. Southland.

Please note trolls how the entire country is involved...

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:02 am  

Gijou wrote: BTW, the official regions of New Zealand Rugby League:- 1. Northland (comprising Far North, Bay of Island, Whangarei). 2. Auckland. 3. Waikato. 4. Bay of Plenty. 5. Gisborne - East Coast. 6. Taranaki. 7. Hawkes Bay. 8. Manawatu. 9. Wellington. 10. Nelson Marlborough. 11. Canterbury. 12. West Coast. 13. Otago. 14. Southland. Please note trolls how the entire country is involved... From the NZRL website "As part of the 2009 findings of the SPARC report into rugby league in New Zealand, New Zealand Rugby League is being organised into seven Zones"....Read on if you dare... As for kiwi's 13-6.....you hark back to the past...when it is what will happen that is important. Tell you what, I'll stop posting generalistic theories on here if you stop posting generalistic theories on the Quins board......OK

Gijou wrote: BTW, the official regions of New Zealand Rugby League:- 1. Northland (comprising Far North, Bay of Island, Whangarei). 2. Auckland. 3. Waikato. 4. Bay of Plenty. 5. Gisborne - East Coast. 6. Taranaki. 7. Hawkes Bay. 8. Manawatu. 9. Wellington. 10. Nelson Marlborough. 11. Canterbury. 12. West Coast. 13. Otago. 14. Southland. Please note trolls how the entire country is involved... From the NZRL website "As part of the 2009 findings of the SPARC report into rugby league in New Zealand, New Zealand Rugby League is being organised into seven Zones"....Read on if you dare... As for kiwi's 13-6.....you hark back to the past...when it is what will happen that is important. Tell you what, I'll stop posting generalistic theories on here if you stop posting generalistic theories on the Quins board......OK

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:06 am  

gutterfax wrote: From the NZRL website "As part of the 2009 findings of the SPARC report into rugby league in New Zealand, New Zealand Rugby League is being organised into seven Zones"....Read on if you dare... As for kiwi's 13-6.....you hark back to the past...when it is what will happen that is important. Tell you what, I'll stop posting generalistic theories on here if you stop posting generalistic theories on the Quins board......OK So...??? I pointed out the traditional organisation of New Zealand Rugby League - which takes into account every single corner of New Zealand. According to you:- 1. New Zealand rugby league is all in Auckland; and 2. There is no rugby league in the South Island of NZ. Idiot.

gutterfax wrote: From the NZRL website "As part of the 2009 findings of the SPARC report into rugby league in New Zealand, New Zealand Rugby League is being organised into seven Zones"....Read on if you dare... As for kiwi's 13-6.....you hark back to the past...when it is what will happen that is important. Tell you what, I'll stop posting generalistic theories on here if you stop posting generalistic theories on the Quins board......OK So...??? I pointed out the traditional organisation of New Zealand Rugby League - which takes into account every single corner of New Zealand. According to you:- 1. New Zealand rugby league is all in Auckland; and 2. There is no rugby league in the South Island of NZ. Idiot.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:07 am  

Oh yeah...I forgot.

Rugby league didn't exist in NZ around 1990 either according to you.