gutterfax wrote:
Brilliant that your club are bringing kids on.....just a shame it's taken 100+ years eh
In your opinion roofs.......in your opinion.
SKY TV money.....how'd your club go without that? We'd fold, and I reckon your club wouldn't be far behind.
I am probably the No1 critic of the way the London ESL club has been nmanaged. I don't live in any fantasy world where the finances and crowds (lack of) don't matter....of course they do, but I will defend the club when attacked by anti-expansionists like you who freely admit to never attending a game in London on principle.
WTF are you talking about "just a shame it's taken 100+ years eh"?!
Rovers have brought through many young English players during our history. ATEOTD because of a very dark 10-15 year period the club lost it's ability to attract local young players (said players often choosing the SL club Hull FC over the NL club Hull KR - not a surprise and you can't blame any of them), but by Neil Hudgell, Paul Lakin and others rebuilding Rovers the club is now bringing talented young English lads to the club, and this is a work in progress.
Well of course Rovers probably rely on the Sky TV money as much as any other club, but Fulcrubronquins had years and years of preferential treatment and bailouts, oh and you're not a club, you're an Experiment.
FCBQE's finances and pathetic crowds don't matter anyway - they will wrongly keep their franchise next week, and will do so till the end of time, despite 30 years of failure and people not giving a $h1t about RL in the capital.