: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:28 pm  

cadoo wrote:

Matt king is 1.3 million over 4 years.

As for Carmont Wigan announced they had 140K on the cap and signed Mathers and Karl Pryce and in addition Carmont

Pryce, Carmont and Mathers are sharing £140,000 between them?

Somebody has done a good sellng job if that's correct.

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:35 pm  

DAZ™ wrote:

Pryce, Carmont and Mathers are sharing £140,000 between them?

Somebody has done a good sellng job if that's correct.

I think Danny Hills wage is added to the 140K figure.

But still great piece of business from Wigan.

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:36 pm  

cadoo wrote:

I think Danny Hills wage is added to the 140K figure.

But still great piece of business from Wigan.

great! i'd go as far as to say... unbelievable!!

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:48 pm  

cadoo wrote:

I think Danny Hills wage is added to the 140K figure.

But still great piece of business from Wigan.

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:58 pm  

Oxford Exile wrote:

I am very confident that when the weather gets better and the pitches get better...Matt King will ram this statement down your fat pie eating neck

Why is he not doing it now?

Still knocking them z's out?

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:04 pm  

king piemon wrote:

Why is he not doing it now?

Still knocking them z's out?

Is that another reference to that lunatic Mathers attempted murder on him..?

Oh sorry he's not that kind of player,Poor Richie Mathers

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:06 pm  

RedLionMike wrote:

Is that another reference to that lunatic Mathers attempted murder on him..?

Oh sorry he's not that kind of player,Poor Richie Mathers

I've heared it all now

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:14 pm  

cadoo wrote:

When will that be? May , June?

Do you really want a player on that much money to only be performing a quarter of the season?

Carmont can play on any pitch regardless of the weather. Why can't King?

You're easily pleased in Wigan, is this the old fabel that when anybody signs for Wigan they're suddenly very good and when they reject Wigan(which in all honesty tends to happen quite alot nowadays) they suddenly become helpful? It seems Buderus pied you of(excuse the pun) to play for a decent team as well. I love it how you're aware of wages SL players are on also..oh wait.it said it in the papers..it must be true. Let's crary on and use your logic then..Is Lee Briers better then Trent Barrett?

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:43 pm  

king piemon wrote:

Why is he not doing it now?

Still knocking them z's out?

KP catches another

Re: Matt king : Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:59 pm  

Wire MVP wrote:

You're easily pleased in Wigan, is this the old fabel that when anybody signs for Wigan they're suddenly very good and when they reject Wigan(which in all honesty tends to happen quite alot nowadays) they suddenly become helpful? It seems Buderus pied you of(excuse the pun) to play for a decent team as well. I love it how you're aware of wages SL players are on also..oh wait.it said it in the papers..it must be true. Let's crary on and use your logic then..Is Lee Briers better then Trent Barrett?

Sometimes players come from the NRL and the excpectations of them are very high. King has not delivered to the high standard people excpected from him. And tbh King has disappointed. Hes more than lilkley the highest paid player in SL and shows nothing of the quality of the best players in the league.

As for Carmont hes solid very reliable and pretty decent with ball in hand. Has played well in most games this season. you cant say that about King can you.