Re: Kirk Yeaman : Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:54 pm
DP_wwrlfc wrote:
Martin Gleeson is a complete different class to Yeaman as FC fans will soon workout for themselves. I rate Shenton and Bridge also above Yeaman and would also play Joel Tomkins there before him even though he has'nt completely adjusted to the centre position as he has the potential to be imo the best English centre by some distance. For the Exiles i'd go with ...
S Tomkins
Watkins
Shenton
J Tomkins
Briscoe
I dont think Gleeson will be playing again for England even though for me he's the best English centre we have. I rate Watkins and he looks a classy player but is'nt experienced enough or composed to play at centre yet he gets exposed way to often at centre.
S Tomkins
Watkins
Shenton
J Tomkins
Briscoe
I dont think Gleeson will be playing again for England even though for me he's the best English centre we have. I rate Watkins and he looks a classy player but is'nt experienced enough or composed to play at centre yet he gets exposed way to often at centre.
You got there before me.
Now Gleeson is at Hull, Yeaman isn't Hulls best centre, let alone the best English centre in SL.
I also think that some of my fellow Hull fans are confusing the fact that Yeaman has scored a fair few tries with being in great form.
Within 30 minutes of his Debut against hkr, Gleeson showed how good he is, when he attacked the line for the try he got the defence didn't know which way he was going to go until it was too late.
Yeaman is all heart and commitment (for which there is nothing wrong and is credit to him). He is defencively very strong but prone to jumping out of the line too often and missing the man. With the ball he is strong but has limited passing skills and doesn't know how to step round a defender. He relies on bulldozing at the line, which against an organised defence will rarely reap dividends.
Atkins and Shenton for me for England.