Roofs wrote:
:lol:
Okay I was wrong, in that it was reported that Hudds had 12,000 there. However ( ), I'm also certain that I read 6000 in RLE (a more objective paper ), around the same time, so might have to conduct a little research if I have some spare time at some point.
Okay I was wrong, in that it was reported that Hudds had 12,000 there. However ( ), I'm also certain that I read 6000 in RLE (a more objective paper ), around the same time, so might have to conduct a little research if I have some spare time at some point.
so wouldnt the league express have reported it too then ? or is what they say to be taken as gospel ?