Re: London Broncos : Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:38 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Well hopefully this is their home come what may for the next few decades.

It would be better if,after a period of consolidation,they out grow this ground

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:31 am  

Do they have any options to play their "bigger games" elsewhere or, could they actually have some all ticket games.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:21 pm  

The long term plan is for Barnet FC to grow slowly and the ground has a potential for 10k in the future, London could grow with that.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:33 pm  

Mystic Yed wrote:

The long term plan...

When did we last have one of those?

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:48 pm  

littlerich wrote:

If I was an investor wrapped in 2 straight jackets with 2 pencils up both nostrils I wouldn't touch London Broncos with a barge pole. Where the f**k have you been for the last five years???

They're called benefactors sunshine, not investors.

They need an investor who will be hands on some one like koukash not a benefactor. They have potentially the largest fan base by far, largest playing pool and can offer a massive incentive living in London. all in all the right amount of money and man power they could be a force, if they settle for just survival then it will just repeat.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:46 pm  

dubairl wrote:

They need an investor who will be hands on some one like koukash not a benefactor. They have potentially the largest fan base by far, largest playing pool and can offer a massive incentive living in London. all in all the right amount of money and man power they could be a force, if they settle for just survival then it will just repeat.

Koukash is still a benefactor, not an investor. At least I hope for Salford's sake that's how he sees it, because he doesn't have a cat in hell's chance of making money out of an RL club, the same as any other chairman.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:27 pm  

EAT, SLEEP, LONDON RL, REPEAT, EAT, SLEEP, LONDON RL,REPEAT

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:58 pm  

Nothus wrote:

Koukash is still a benefactor, not an investor. At least I hope for Salford's sake that's how he sees it, because he doesn't have a cat in hell's chance of making money out of an RL club, the same as any other chairman.

seriously a benefactor would hand over money that is it koukash is doing a lot more than just that and London need some one the same.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 5:12 pm  

dubairl wrote:

seriously a benefactor would hand over money that is it koukash is doing a lot more than just that and London need some one the same.

You are missing the point.

Investor - one who lays out money or capital in an enterprise with the expectation of profit.

Benefactor - one who supports a person or institution by GIVING money.

Subtle difference.

Re: London Broncos : Sat Dec 14, 2013 5:22 pm  

Fax Machine wrote:

You are missing the point.

Investor - one who lays out money or capital in an enterprise with the expectation of profit.

Benefactor - one who supports a person or institution by GIVING money.

Subtle difference.

the subtle difference is that they are a rugby league club and can turn over a profit if run right. just because at present they don't doesn't mean they can't. anybody who has the right money and gets the right people and are willing to work hard can make London successful. Or whats the point to carry on bothering with a team that relies heavily on hand outs and has no ambition to do better?