Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:08 pm  

cadoo wrote:

Not a guess mate the harsh truth.


Matt king is on 300K a season.

How do you know this?

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:14 pm  

Wire MVP wrote:

How many games have you seen King play?

3 Same as Carmont

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:16 pm  

Wire MVP wrote:

How do you know this?

Wigan offered 250k a season but got gazzumped by Wire.

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:39 pm  

cadoo wrote:

Not a guess mate the harsh truth.


Matt king is on 300K a season.

Well Warrington are ripping themselves of abot there then, imo no player in the world is worth that.

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:46 pm  

moxi1 wrote:

Well Warrington are ripping themselves of abot there then, imo no player in the world is worth that.

In the cap era its a bit too much, but if they win GF it will seem to be money well spent. But look at Wigan for the 140K we got Carmont, Mathers and hopefully Pryce will gain his fitness.

: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:13 pm  

He isn't on 300k.
Never ever ever.
Some people will believe anything...

: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:13 pm  

Dico wrote:

He isn't on 300k.
Never ever ever.
Some people will believe anything...

Prove it.

: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:12 pm  

tank123 wrote:

Prove it.

Prove he does.

: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:14 pm  

well this is childish

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:19 pm  

tank123 wrote: Wigan offered 250k a season but got gazzumped by Wire. Wigan withdrew according to this: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... 4#12603654 So it can't be both, can it.

tank123 wrote: Wigan offered 250k a season but got gazzumped by Wire. Wigan withdrew according to this: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... 4#12603654 So it can't be both, can it.