Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:55 pm  

Frustrating today trying to watch without knowing the teams. How hard can it be to release the team list?

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:57 pm  

red missed1 wrote:

Well done to everyone who made the effort to attend. It's a shame the attendance was so low. I thought the young lad at full back (No7) looked decent and liked the number 28 when he came on. We looked really sharp 1st 20 mins but it got a bit scrappy after that. Theo Fages was impressive and him and Sneyd look ok together. Bit light in the pack again. Backs look decent and we've got good options at hooker with Wagga Goodwin and Howarth.

Agree with most of that, especially the 'light in the pack' bit. I don't think the backs covered themselves in glory, though, as they let too many Swinton kick-offs bounce in field. Wigan will punish every one of those errors. Still, it was a decent enough run-out and there were some real positives.

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:32 pm  

Thought the halves were pretty sharp, that the kid @ full back looked good, we had options from the PTB.
Was pleased to see Gleeson play and you could see from time to time he was a mile ahead of everyone else with his thinking and I do think with game time he will be an asset to a team that it seems with have more youngsters in it than we would have hoped for.

A negative from the very first KO we fielded was the huge gap in the Centre of the park which to their credit Swinton spotted and tried to exploit a few times, worrying was that on field it wasn't spotted nor by people in the dugout or up in the stands.

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:36 pm  

so less than 2000 at a game that could be the very lastin salfords existance and you wonder why the rfl are not backing you like they did bradford does not look to good for you lot why should anyone put money into your club when even your own fans can not be botherd

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:37 pm  

year of the viking wrote:

so less than 2000 at a game that could be the very lastin salfords existance and you wonder why the rfl are not backing you like they did bradford does not look to good for you lot why should anyone put money into your club when even your own fans can not be botherd

I agree, they would be much better giving it you to help you understand the use of full stops and such like.

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:20 pm  

A poor attendance,seems people in Salford are not interested in R.L.The stadium and pitch was excellent,why did the teams not play in their traditional colours.Salfords left winger was a class apart,Swinton had many new players this is going to hinder their progress as it will take a long time for them gell.Good luck for the future

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:20 pm  

Hahahaha.... Less than 2000 ? Rubbish.... As mentioned earlier, that stand holds 4,500 people, and there weren't too many empty seats in it.

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:51 pm  

LoyalFan wrote:

Hahahaha.... Less than 2000 ? Rubbish.... As mentioned earlier, that stand holds 4,500 people, and there weren't too many empty seats in it.

not acording to this

Theboyem wrote:

1811 according to the club on facebook.

or is it another way to dodge the tax man

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:02 pm  

Hmmmmmmm

I spell a returning cock albeit under a new name.

Re: Attendance? : Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:52 pm  

MRed are you spelling or smelling?