: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:22 pm  

RicFox wrote:

riley or higham

Ditto

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:27 pm  

Riley and Rauhihi.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:23 pm  

Rah had a really strong game. Riley looked a class full-back and did little wrong. Higham was very busy in attack and defence. Westwood was Westwood and is never less than excellent.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:53 pm  

chris riley well done mom for me

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:39 pm  

Carvell for me looked like he has waited for that game for a while.

Woody also looked near to his old self and thank goodness he got up fine after every drive he made.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:01 am  

Chris Riley was solid as a rock and had a good game at fullback but for me Micky Higham was our clear stand out player, he brought a bit of class and control to the way we went forward, he was very quick thinking for his try.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 am  

Rob Wire wrote:

Chris Riley was solid as a rock and had a good game at fullback but for me Micky Higham was our clear stand out player, he brought a bit of class and control to the way we went forward, he was very quick thinking for his try.

Yeah, I don't think Riley was involved anywhere near enough to be MOM, but I think people were just really pleased with how he went, so he is getting the plaudits.

Higham was good, although he did make a couple of dodgy passes, including one forward pass.

Personally I thought Westwood was excellent, however I feel we take this level of performance for granted from him.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:07 pm  

1) Rah
2) Hicks
3) That guy who ran across the pitch
4000) Whoever layed that dodgy turf in front of the sticks

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:39 am  

Higham