: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:14 pm  

Wolfette wrote:

Basically the BBC don't pay for an advert, therefore we will delete there adverts.

We need to offer protection to the sponsors that do advertise to keep the RLFANS alive.

RLFANS do not get any money from the BBC.

Please refer to my argument. Not falling out with you as you are nice, but your argument is shockingly naive.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:15 pm  

and Rob_Wire's thread has gone because....?

Seeing as no-one bothered to answer my previous post.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:16 pm  

but it was about warrington, and in the interest of public information should stay imo. oh well perhaps you should ask GMR to sponsor the site

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:17 pm  

worthing wire wrote:

and Rob_Wire's thread has gone because....?

Seeing as no-one bothered to answer my previous post.

Base subjective moderation. Nowt we can do about except push respectfully for elected moderators who can be held accountable by the members. Don't hold your breath, they dig the "power" too much.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:18 pm  

slimwire66 wrote:

but it was about warrington, and in the interest of public information should stay imo. oh well perhaps you should ask GMR to sponsor the site

It's not her fault, she is a minnion, but I agree with you entirely on the first bit.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:18 pm  

would you advertise or allow an advert for a charity event?
do the club give money to this site?
who does give money?
very curious to be honest

would you refuse a sponsorship?
what grounds?/ perameters?

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:20 pm  

Wires71 wrote:

I've read trivial threads about boozers in Warrington, do they pay for advertising? Does Gary Skent pay for advertising? Does The Sun, Sporting Life, The Mirror, Sky Sports, BetFair, PaddyPower, Bet365? We have seen links to all of these private sector organisations sites on here you ninny.

If the BBC advertised on every single minority website (in that I mean non racial minority website) the licence fee would be more than the average wage.

It was clearly public interest and the link should have remained. Anyone with an ounce of sense would tell you that.

PS I know you are just a puppet, blindly following orders like a salivating pavlonian dog, have to do what the RLFans.com hierarchy dictate, so this isn't aimed at you per se. You are just the instrument of the vile policy. A bit like Goebbels was. Shame as you will hang with the rest of them.

Is that what you call a back handed compliment?

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:23 pm  

Lefty wrote:

Is that what you call a back handed compliment?

As nice as she is, she deserved that after that husk of a counter argument. She must think we are all daft. Elected moderators are the way forward, where we can judge each candidates reason, debating skills, eloquence, intellect and knowledge against their rivals and not just appoint on the basis of owning a drum (for example) or knowing an outgoing mod (for example).

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:25 pm  

slimwire66 wrote:

would you advertise or allow an advert for a charity event?
do the club give money to this site?
who does give money?
very curious to be honest

would you refuse a sponsorship?
what grounds?/ perameters?

well? you've got my interest now!!!!

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:26 pm  

Wires71 wrote:

As nice as she is, she deserved that after that husk of a counter argument. She must think we are all daft. Elected moderators are the way forward, where we can judge each candidates reason, debating skills, eloquence, intellect and knowledge against their rivals and not just appoint on the basis of owning a drum (for example) or knowing an outgoing mod (for example).

On one hand I agree with you totally. On the other hand what does it really matter? It's just an internet forum.

If people wanted to know about the Phil Kinsella thing they only have to look at the top story on the official site. Even easier than that download the toolbar, it's amazing.