wire2004 wrote:
What baffles me is that in both instances. Its all heresay.
The Pre season. It was aknowlaged that the referee "thinks" it was said. Thats in the case notes from last time.
This Time. We are solely relying on a player with a axe to gride against the club, (as was the case in the Pre season Game) Who was released because he did not agree with the tatics of the coach and the clubs philosophy going forward.
It would be interesting to see the minutes of the disciplinary hearing, to know the process by which this case was judged. If no officials heard anything (which is presumably the case, as no action was taken on the field), then were they going purely on the evidence of an opposition player or players? If so, that sets a precedent that could very easily be manipulated in future.