: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:09 am
I thought the purpose of a scrum was to re-start the game after an error (forward pass, knock-on, etc) had been made. It would only seem fair that the side making the error has to "pay" by being dis-advantaged at the scrum.
So RL scrums are quick and the side that didn't make the error generally get the ball. Seems like that ticks all the necessary boxes.
Alternatively I was watching the Guiness Premiership (English RU top-flight) the other week on SKY and in frustration I timed a scrum from offence occurring to game re-starting. After 4 minutes of collasping scrums, the ref going from open to blind-side and back to see what was happening, touching and engaging the ball came out only for the loose-forward (no.
to knock-on at the base of the scrum and the ref call for another scrum: I swapped channels to Eurosport as the Nordic cross-country skiing looked far more entertaining.