Wires71 wrote:
Assuming not due to injury this is complete and total vindication of all those on here who expressed the view that Russell's is not good enough to warrant a place. Those who cited that we were "hysterical" and that he played well at Widnes perhaps need to have a re-think.
Good on Price for dropping him.
Let me make this clear. You start with an
assumption that it isn’t due to injury. Then leap to that being a
vindication. Then you laud Price for dropping him when your starting point was you don’t know if he was dropped due to injury.
So to answer your question you are definitely one of the usual suspects, but you knew that.
(Just to make it even clearer your use of the word “vindication” was the back clapping I was referring to).
Karetakers reference to continuing to bleat until change takes place (I’m paraphrasing) was the deluded part. (Obviously suspect 2).
If anyone else wants clarification as to whether or not they fall into usual suspect category feel free to ask.
Ps if you can find a post where I suggest that Russell is a good winger, fill your boots.