Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 6:36 am  

karetaker wrote:

It’s now been said Leigh have provided evidence.

Where is this info?

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:55 am  

Captain Hook wrote:

Where is this info?

dependant upon Leigh providing evidence which has now happened. As such McGuire’s case will be heard next week, meaning he can play at Magic Weekend.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 9:13 am  

So, what's the comeback on Lomax for being a lying little turd who winds people up? Shame there's no punishment fit for that!

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 9:34 am  

matt_wire wrote:

So, what's the comeback on Lomax for being a lying little turd who winds people up? Shame there's no punishment fit for that!

In the old days, a forward would flatten him, subdue him for the game.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 9:34 am  

karetaker wrote:

Something is very wrong about this, I mean why as it taken till Tuesday night to provide evidence that something was said. The game was Friday so if something was said by McGuire the proof was already there and should have been dealt with on Monday.

I’m no Columbo but I would be asking why take so long to say something I’d also be suspicious and think someone as been cohersed into corroborating a story. Just doesn’t sit right.

I’d agree you’re no Columbo, and neither am I , but I would have assumed there’d be a motive to cohered on a complaint.
Leigh club has nothing to gain from another suspension to McGuire.

My best guess is that it is purely a moral stance from the Leigh club to support their player.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 10:50 am  

rubber duckie wrote:

I’d agree you’re no Columbo, and neither am I , but I would have assumed there’d be a motive to cohered on a complaint.
Leigh club has nothing to gain from another suspension to McGuire.

My best guess is that it is purely a moral stance from the Leigh club to support their player.

Moral stance does not constitute evidence, guess my point is why take till Tuesday to provide evidence

[Uncle Rico]

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 12:13 pm  

John 8:7

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 12:25 pm  

Uncle Rico wrote:

John 8:7

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.�

That’s most of us not throwing stones then, is it ok to throw one at Charnley.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 12:40 pm  

Uncle Rico wrote:

John 8:7

you know *THREAD DIGRESSION WARNING* just on the biblical quotes. i was quite disapointed that the club( who aren't affraid of a little copyright infringement) when we signed blake austin, they didn't do a rip off, of the famous WW t shirts for stone called steve austin that said

AUSTIN
3:16

they could have amended it to

AUSTIN
6:13

(cos he wore six and there are 13 players in a team)

thats money missed

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Thu Jun 01, 2023 2:19 pm  

karetaker wrote:

Moral stance does not constitute evidence, guess my point is why take till Tuesday to provide evidence

Monday was a bank holiday?