: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:15 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:

No they don't count, clearly, as they're in the past and therefore can't be used as a stick to beat Warrington's coaching staff in 2009.

But hold on, he was using injuries from our past to back up his argument, so surely.....

Oh wait a minute. With the 3 injuries suffered this year, 2 of them have been in training (although it was never confirmed where Riley got injured). That's how he came to the conclusion

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:16 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:

No they don't count, clearly, as they're in the past and therefore can't be used as a stick to beat Warrington's coaching staff in 2009.

Go back a page dear and read when cockney said "during our current fitness staff"

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:17 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

Go back a page dear and read when cockney said "during our current fitness staff"

Or when you said "are you taking the p(i)ss? Some of those date back to 2002" ?

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:17 pm  

Injuries happen in training, it is just a fact. You can warm-up carefully but they still happen. I would be worried if there wasn't the odd minor injury in training because at least it shows they are training at a good intensity.

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:17 pm  

CockneyWire RAI wrote:

But hold on, he was using injuries from our past to back up his argument, so surely.....

I wasn't i was simply answering people's questions.

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:19 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

Go back a page dear and read when cockney said "during our current fitness staff"

I said that, not you, you're supposed to be proving your original post.

Don't our current fitness staff go back to pre-season 2008? Meaning all of Hull FC's injuries from that point would count in the argument anyway?

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:23 pm  

Needless to say, but can you now see why I suggested you liked to be negative about the club at any available opportunity?

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:26 pm  

CockneyWire RAI wrote:

I said that, not you, you're supposed to be proving your original post.

Don't our current fitness staff go back to pre-season 2008? Meaning all of Hull FC's injuries from that point would count in the argument anyway?

I could try to justify my first post until i am blue in the face but once again all you get is pathetic sarcastic comments made by other posters and Forum Moderators.

To answer your question most (not all) of our firtness team go back pre-season 2008 and yes Hull Fc would be taken into account.
I don't know the reasons for the players injuries at Hull FC in 2008 but im sure they wasn't all sustained in training (some were).

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:30 pm  

CockneyWire RAI wrote:

Needless to say, but can you now see why I suggested you liked to be negative about the club at any available opportunity?

It isn't negative or at least i don't mean it to be, there is something happening at the club which i consider a problem, i asked for people's opinion as to why this happens all the time (not just once or twice) and is there anything we as a club can do to improve the situation.

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:33 pm  

It's more negative than the flat end of a battery