: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:38 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

Oh yes, you have, massively.

If King is on £300k+, yet isn't the highest earner at the club, that would mean we have two players taking up nearly half the salary cap.

Have a word with yourself.

He isn't on £300+ a year in wages, Simon Moran sponsors him so his full wage doesn't have to go through the salary cap.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:39 am  

Wolfette wrote:

Yeah

Matt King
Mrs King
Matt Kings Agent
Andy Gatcliffe
Simon Moran

Hoyle.
Gatcliffe.
King.
Moran.
Me.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:40 am  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

Hoyle.
Gatcliffe.
King.
Moran.
Me.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:40 am  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

He isn't on £300+ a year in wages, Simon Moran sponsors him so his full wage doesn't have to go through the salary cap.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:41 am  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

He isn't on £300+ a year in wages, Simon Moran sponsors him so his full wage doesn't have to go through the salary cap.

Yet third-party arrangements do fall under the salary cap. Have some more rope.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:42 am  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

Hoyle.
Gatcliffe.
King.
Moran.
Me.

I despair I really do...

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:43 am  

behind the stick wrote:

:lol:

May I add some more, please?

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:48 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

Yet third-party arrangements do fall under the salary cap. Have some more rope.

It isn't a third party arrangement.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:52 am  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

It isn't a third party arrangement.

So Simon Moran/SJM sponsor him, but it isn't a third-party arrangement?

What is it then?

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:53 am  

Stop bickering you two.