: Thu May 07, 2009 3:30 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Tahu? Gower? Luke Rooney?

Won't be Gasnier or $BW.

I was thinking more Chris Ashton or Lesley Vainikolo, wouldn't really want either of them though.

Might be time to change your sig as well, hasn't Mick Crocker's Visa been rejected again. FWIW I don't agree with world class players being prevented from plying their trade here because of minor convictions.

: Thu May 07, 2009 3:36 pm  

FireWire wrote:

I was thinking more Chris Ashton or Lesley Vainikolo, wouldn't really want either of them though.

Might be time to change your sig as well, hasn't Mick Crocker's Visa been rejected again. FWIW I don't agree with world class players being prevented from plying their trade here because of minor convictions.

Forgot about them tbh also Hape too.

Ashton may be a good bet for a return perhaps, although you've got Mathers now.

CBA to change my sig

: Thu May 07, 2009 5:40 pm  

he played at Wigan

: Thu May 07, 2009 5:44 pm  

Mr Potatoe Head wrote:

I will allow one more week for taches 'rumour' to materialise. After that it will be consigned to the bull shine bin.

Like Latch said if its allowed to rumble on he might claim a signing announced in July was the one he was talking about.

Both Tache and Eddie intimated that the 'signing' would be one taking place sooner rather than later ie, in the following weeks not months.

Considering that most signings are announced via the Guardian on a Thursday, I will put a deadline of 14th May for taches rumour.

I think when this one comes off, you two may be made to look more than a little foolish.

More foolish than when LWF, claimed he was that in the know, he got info that only Simon Moran, Gatcliffe, Himself & AN Other got, and tried to make out that himself & SJM were like Keenan & Kel.

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:21 pm  

JWP wrote:

I think when this one comes off, you two may be made to look more than a little foolish.

Thats the point though JWP, when what comes off?

They havent even given this winger/player a name!!!!

It allows quite a wide margin for error dont you think

Also they made out it was gonna happen soon, and that was a few weeks ago.

I dont think it will be me looking foolish, more like tache when he trys to claim glory on some random signing that everyone else knows we will make at some point this year

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:24 pm  

Mr Potatoe Head wrote:

Thats the point though JWP, when what comes off?

They havent even given this winger/player a name!!!!

It allows quite a wide margin for error dont you think

Also they made out it was gonna happen soon, and that was a few weeks ago.

I dont think it will be me looking foolish, more like tache when he trys to claim glory on some random signing that everyone else knows we will make at some point this year

Well, if we sign a winger, who's played RL, currently in Union in the next couple of weeks, like Tache said, then I think that's pretty much nail on head, anything outside of that, I reckon is open to debate.

I think his description he's give, is quite specific.

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:26 pm  

JWP wrote:

Well, if we sign a winger, who's played RL, currently in Union in the next couple of weeks, like Tache said, then I think that's pretty much nail on head, anything outside of that, I reckon is open to debate.

I think his description he's give, is quite specific.

Not specific enough for us to identify the said player.

Unless you know who it is of course

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:27 pm  

Mr Potatoe Head wrote:

Not specific enough for us to identify the said player.

Unless you know who it is of course

What do you want, inside leg ?

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:33 pm  

JWP wrote:

What do you want, inside leg ?

To be honest I would be hard pushed to name a single union player, irrespective of whether they have played league before or not.

I just dont follow union at all.

Maybe you could enlighten me JWP, by PM of course

: Thu May 07, 2009 6:36 pm  

JWP wrote:

Well, if we sign a winger, who's played RL, currently in Union in the next couple of weeks, like Tache said, then I think that's pretty much nail on head, anything outside of that, I reckon is open to debate.

I think his description he's give, is quite specific.

Its got to be Vainikolo IMO.

But he's not exactly set the RU world alight, got mates who support Gloucester and they said he's been shi'ite.