Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Jul 26, 2023 8:19 pm
Dita's Slot Meter wrote:
This is pretty simple, isn't it?
Asiata's tackles were not illegal, so he shouldn't face any punishment.
However, Asiata's tackling technique has injured 4 players in one match, which suggests the law that says Asiata's tackling technique is legal needs changing immediately.
As for Wellens supposedly whining, I'd be disappointed if he never brought this up as he has - For the disciplinary committee to almost brush this off as part of the game is gross incompetence on their part. They are surely there to be monitoring and constantly reviewing this sort of thing and for a player to injure 4 players and for it not to raise some sort of inquiry suggests they aren't fit to do their job.
Seems to me they only like to be seen taking action when it's trendy stuff like naughty words, rather than when players are having career-threatening injuries inflicted on them?
Asiata's tackles were not illegal, so he shouldn't face any punishment.
However, Asiata's tackling technique has injured 4 players in one match, which suggests the law that says Asiata's tackling technique is legal needs changing immediately.
As for Wellens supposedly whining, I'd be disappointed if he never brought this up as he has - For the disciplinary committee to almost brush this off as part of the game is gross incompetence on their part. They are surely there to be monitoring and constantly reviewing this sort of thing and for a player to injure 4 players and for it not to raise some sort of inquiry suggests they aren't fit to do their job.
Seems to me they only like to be seen taking action when it's trendy stuff like naughty words, rather than when players are having career-threatening injuries inflicted on them?
Fair enough. How would you word the new law that would make this tackle illegal? Seems to me he barrelled into running legs ?