Re: Leigh sign......... : Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:40 pm  

ColD wrote:

I’m pretty sure he’s not, presumably the guy needs to earn an improved contract. Or do you suggest we pay him over the odds - because that’s worked out well for us in the past

You are the one ( I totally agree) who said we are very light on bodies. Do you suggest we will go the full season as we are. Let's get realistic.

Re: Leigh sign......... : Thu Jan 24, 2019 7:16 am  

atomic wrote:

You are the one ( I totally agree) who said we are very light on bodies. Do you suggest we will go the full season as we are. Let's get realistic.

Think we are on very dangerous ground relying on Saints dictatating who we can and can’t have. Like to think we have a little clout in getting who we need, but think there is very little chance of that

In all honesty I’m not even sure what the rules are as to how many loanees/DR we can have in the squad, all I can say is that we appear to be in a better position now than most expected at the end of last season

Re: Leigh sign......... : Thu Jan 24, 2019 7:58 am  

ColD wrote:

Think we are on very dangerous ground relying on Saints dictatating who we can and can’t have. Like to think we have a little clout in getting who we need, but think there is very little chance of that

In all honesty I’m not even sure what the rules are as to how many loanees/DR we can have in the squad, all I can say is that we appear to be in a better position now than most expected at the end of last season

The maximum that can be played is 5 DR/Loans. But there isn’t any rule as to how many are in a squad.