: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:44 pm  

You mean a Betamax?

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:47 pm  

Walt Mooney Fan Club wrote:

That being the case Fred (or anyone who has knowledge of this) - and please don't bite my head off for asking a genuine question!! - was this a mistake by someone within the stadium Mgmt team - or does this come under the actual 'fit & finish' of the build?

... or a genuine cost-cutter? (as I suspect - and I'm guessing that is why we do not have screens in place at both corners!)

....or was it never an intention to have Television/Video screens up??

I dont think cost cutting was the reason, otherwise we wouldnt have a £100k telly strapped to the front of the West Stand showing adverts to the trees.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:54 pm  

The cost of a 'proper' tv style screen of any size would be astrom asmo..... too much far far too much to be honest (imagine the price of a 250 inch LCD or Plasma tv that was weather proof ?- the ones that SKY hire out to SL clubs cost a fortune) so I suppose cost cutting would be a reason but honestly whoever was responsble for the whole design of the place with TV cameras etc in mind didnt get much if any advice from 'them in the know' for example if the sun had been shining bright last evening it would have been directly over the centre of the west stand directly in the lenses of the cameras in the east stand, a nuisance to my £600 camcorder but to a HD broadcast camera where the lenses alone cost £12000 a massive problem as a bright sunlight can burn a lens out (it happened to one of mine at Hilton Park a couple of years ago as like a nit I turned it on when it was pointing directly at the sun - by accident I hastily add ) so a mixture of cost cutting and/or bad advice IMO.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:54 pm  

Does it really matter we will be on sky around 3 times this season,why are we always looking for someone to crucify?

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:55 pm  

Alexs Dad wrote:

You mean a Betamax?

Funny enough ALL broadcast TV cameras up until HD came out were a type of betamax it was far superior to VHS.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:57 pm  

Herald wrote:

Does it really matter we will be on sky around 3 times this season,why are we always looking for someone to crucify?

I think (as did I TBH) that they may have been able to 'hook up' to the match day camera to show replays etc.. but at the moment that isn't possible.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:59 pm  

So just to clarify. If SKY was to screen a SL match at LSV, SKY could position their own big screen in front of LSV's 'state of the art' £100k big screen and then invoice the LSV for the provision of a big screen...

Someone please tell me that's not correct

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:43 pm  

leighonardo wrote:

So just to clarify. If SKY was to screen a SL match at LSV, SKY could position their own big screen in front of LSV's 'state of the art' £100k big screen and then invoice the LSV for the provision of a big screen...

Someone please tell me that's not correct

Me thinks no one will tell you that

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:34 pm  

leighonardo wrote:

So just to clarify. If SKY was to screen a SL match at LSV, SKY could position their own big screen in front of LSV's 'state of the art' £100k big screen and then invoice the LSV for the provision of a big screen...

Someone please tell me that's not correct

They do the same at most, if not all, grounds that have an existing screen - can remember Sky sticking their own screen in front of the existing one at the Reebok for a GB game.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:20 pm  

they would probably put it in the opposite corner or any of the other two