Re: James Bell : Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:48 am
Septimius Severus wrote:
Assessment of James Bell, or as Lammy likes to call him Bell(y) (in that great Rugby League tradition of adding a Y to a name). Bell is too good for Leigh and not good enough for Saints. St Helens have a non-event Cup match against Whitehaven and want to give him a run out. He unavailable for fitness/injury reasons and so will probably continue at Leigh in order to get some game time.
The best hope is that he spends most of the season at Leigh and we re-sign him at the end of the season. There are are very few genuine 13's in the game, and personally I think the game is poorer for it.
The best hope is that he spends most of the season at Leigh and we re-sign him at the end of the season. There are are very few genuine 13's in the game, and personally I think the game is poorer for it.
I disagree with your opinion that Bell is to good for Leigh , for me Leigh are worthy of any great player , in the past John Woods , and Alex Murphy ,and had in Harry Pinner one of the best 13s ever to grace the game .
James Bell is a very modest guy , I have spoken to him a couple of times , in Pennington Hall Park , he is glad to be playing at Leigh ,and I feel an offer us so much , I’d love to see Dan Norman sign for us as well,hopefully James will be fit enough to feature on Friday night for us .