Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:58 am  

Who do you think will/should be selected for the next match? Thought I read a post saying that you had a new signing lined up. Does anyone know who this is? Would you bring in Cookson, Rudd, Thomas or maybe even recall Hatton or Cunniffe? How would you change your line up from Saturday, if at all?

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:50 am  

etoile1 wrote:

Who do you think will/should be selected for the next match? Thought I read a post saying that you had a new signing lined up. Does anyone know who this is? Would you bring in Cookson, Rudd, Thomas or maybe even recall Hatton or Cunniffe? How would you change your line up from Saturday, if at all?

If the following team is fit and available on the day then this IS what should be played.


1 - Donlan
2 - Stewart
3 - Rudd
4 - Higson
5 - Reay
6 - Ridyard
7 - Watson
8 - Hobson
9 - Durbin
10 - Hill
11 - Armistead
12 - Taylor
13 - Smith

14 - Morrison
15 - Cookson
16 - Marsh
17 - McConnell




FFS...................I hope NK reads this!!!!

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:31 am  

Kelly's Eye wrote:

If the following team is fit and available on the day then this IS what should be played.


1 - Donlan
2 - Stewart
3 - Rudd
4 - Higson
5 - Reay
6 - Ridyard
7 - Watson
8 - Hobson
9 - Durbin
10 - Hill
11 - Armistead
12 - Taylor
13 - Smith

14 - Morrison
15 - Cookson
16 - Marsh
17 - McConnell




FFS...................I hope NK reads this!!!!

No Mort? Best player in recent weeks for me!

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:35 am  

Kelly's Eye wrote:

If the following team is fit and available on the day then this IS what should be played.


1 - Donlan
2 - Stewart
3 - Rudd
4 - Higson
5 - Reay
6 - Ridyard
7 - Watson
8 - Hobson
9 - Durbin
10 - Hill
11 - Armistead
12 - Taylor
13 - Smith

14 - Morrison
15 - Cookson
16 - Marsh
17 - McConnell




FFS...................I hope NK reads this!!!!

the back line looks so slow i wouldnt drop stanton

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:48 am  

Kelly's Eye wrote:

If the following team is fit and available on the day then this IS what should be played.


1 - Donlan
2 - Stewart
3 - Rudd
4 - Higson
5 - Reay
6 - Ridyard
7 - Watson
8 - Hobson
9 - Durbin
10 - Hill
11 - Armistead
12 - Taylor
13 - Smith

14 - Morrison
15 - Cookson
16 - Marsh
17 - McConnell




FFS...................I hope NK reads this!!!!

...and realizes he knows better

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:50 am  

Saley wrote:

No Mort? Best player in recent weeks for me!

May be, but not the best 1 at the club and unfortunatley he would struggle anywhere else in this team at this moment in time IMHO so whilst its harsh that needs to be accepted for the good of the TEAM at this moment in time, that does'nt however mean that I think he is a bad player because I don't and he still has plenty time on his side.

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:51 am  

wbk666 wrote:

...and realizes he knows better

Given what's occurred so far this season I doubt that would be the case

Re: Team for Thursday : Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:55 am  

Lemon wrote:

the back line looks so slow i wouldnt drop stanton

I am not so sure about that, but each to their own.

Stanton defensively is a risk and risks need to be put to one side right now.

1 - 5 we are solid defensively and have enough ability to put points on the board, granted we may have slightly more pace available elsewhere in the squad from players who have not been selected but some of those players present slightly more risk in other aspects of the game.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:07 pm  

Hobson should be nowhere near the team on current form imho.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:20 pm  

put mort on wing reay to fullback maden defence is very poor dos nt look intrested to me put donlan at standoff