Alan wrote:
He was guilty - no question of that - but
NINE matches? The only player injured in the incident was the one he was misguidedly attempting to avenge.
The process seems to place far more emphasis on "potential to cause injury", rather than actually causing injury. I'm afraid we need to offload Jamie now, for our own good, and probably his. (I wonder what his punishments would be at another club?
)
Indeed , RL as a sport needs to look carefully at itself with regards how it is perceived , we see players deliberately going out to injure fellow professionals with high tackles , spear tackles , late shots and shoulder charges to the head , all much more dangerous than what Jamie did in anger at seeing one of his teammates targeted
If we want parents to take their sons to clubs to play the sport , we must allay their fears
Either way , what is done is done